Can this be the year of the Duke?

Light of day or darkest of night?

  • Come get some....in 09...only for the 360 and PC

  • It will come in 09, but not exclusive

  • Maybe timely exclusive, but not forever, oh yeah, and 09 release

  • It´s too early to talk about exclusivity as the game is not going to be released this year

  • The day it gets released is the day the Earth dies in a ball of flame

  • I just don´t care anymore


Results are only viewable after voting.
Got the demo and I love it. After a little tweeking with my Catalyst Control Center it looks great.

Pre ordered the game after I finished the demo the first time.


This is really happening people!


:doom: :doom: :doom:
 
Traded in some stuff at gamestop to get enough credit to get Duke Nukem next week. I'm super ****ing stoked!!!!
 
^^ As am I! I've been waiting 12 years for this and the demo just bumped my hype up even more!
 
I'm playing it now! It's s'alright. I think I built it up a bit too much in my mind because of nostalgia before hand though.
 
It was longer then 12 years for me. It was in development fully since 97, I remember it with the Quake 2 engine. I remember even the rumors in 1996 that they were thinking of making a Build 2.0 engine and making the game. Technically I've been waiting since the first screenshots in 97, so its been a good 14 years for me.

But I will still wait and see the reviews, I hope they do not bash it for its dev time, just judge the game for itself, whether it be good or bad.
 
I don't know who is going into Duke Nukem Forever expecting it achieve some misplaced hype. The game coming out is an achievement alone, with everything the project has gone through. There are going to be people who have never even played a Duke game who won't "get it", either. Gearbox just getting this game out at all...I dunno, that alone is what the hype is all about I think.

I don't know how fair it'd be to review the thing with the years and years of development it's had in mind, or how fair it'd be to leave all of that out. I don't really know. Reviewing it for what it is, would probably be the best way to approach it.

I'm really curious to see what they do with Duke in a sequel to Forever.
 
I don't know who is going into Duke Nukem Forever expecting it achieve some misplaced hype. The game coming out is an achievement alone, with everything the project has gone through. There are going to be people who have never even played a Duke game who won't "get it", either. Gearbox just getting this game out at all...I dunno, that alone is what the hype is all about I think.

I don't know how fair it'd be to review the thing with the years and years of development it's had in mind, or how fair it'd be to leave all of that out. I don't really know. Reviewing it for what it is, would probably be the best way to approach it.

I'm really curious to see what they do with Duke in a sequel to Forever.

I think you need to look at it like Guns n' Roses Chinese Democracy, don't factor in the development hell it went through. Just see it for what it is.
 
I can't believe none of my friends are familiar with Duke Nukem AT ALL. They see the trailer and say "WTF is this???" They just don't understand how badass Duke Nukem is
 
I think you need to look at it like Guns n' Roses Chinese Democracy, don't factor in the development hell it went through. Just see it for what it is.

Yeah, agreed. Nothing can ever live up to the development hell that they've been through.

I really liked Chinese Democracy, too.

I can't believe none of my friends are familiar with Duke Nukem AT ALL. They see the trailer and say "WTF is this???" They just don't understand how badass Duke Nukem is

Wow. I guess depending on they're age it might make sense. I think there's a "History of the Legend" video up on PSN...probably XBL too...which I guess would serve as a history lesson on the kickass awesomeness of Duke.
 
I can't believe none of my friends are familiar with Duke Nukem AT ALL. They see the trailer and say "WTF is this???" They just don't understand how badass Duke Nukem is

How old are your friends? Were they still on their mama's teat when the first one came out?
 
Duke Nukem 3D was amazing, IMO. I wanted a new one ever since then....but it didn't happen. Until now.
 
Duke Nukem Forever review: Fail to the King, Baby.

A big part of the problem is actually the game's one truly distinguishing feature: its attitude, or at least its attempt at one. Times have changed, but the character of Duke Nukem -- his quips lifted from countless '80s and '90s era action films and his objectification of women equaled only by older Arnold Schwarzenegger roles -- is stuck in a bygone era. Jokes that may have spurred laughter all those years ago simply had me shaking my head, wondering if even a 12-year-old would find them funny ... even though, at that age, they wouldn't be able to buy the M-rated title. But why have that rating, even? If anything, a largely bloodless game that has its tone set in the opening moments when the player is instructed to pull the right trigger to take a piss, and can pick up – then throw – a piece of human poop from a toilet just moments later, is surely just ture. That could really be said about its writing and design in general. Want to play the true successor to Duke Nukem 3D? It's called Bulletstorm.
 
Hmmm I always thought the attitude was the whole point. He's supposed to be a Schwarzenegger knock off. I'm still getting the damn game. To hell with ****** reviews
 
Got the game from Direcr2Drive. It should finish downloading in about 20mins.
 
I can sorta understand the criticism. Satire of the 80s and 90s is like, 10 years too late.

Should have updated it to be a satire of this era of action movies etc.
 
I palyed the demo numerous times and i enjyoed it completely. I guess it's because I'm a fan of the classic first person shooters from the 90's. Hell, the last CoD I played was the first modern Warfare, so I'm really not up to date on those.
 
I can sorta understand the criticism. Satire of the 80s and 90s is like, 10 years too late.

Should have updated it to be a satire of this era of action movies etc.

From what I understand, alot of the criticism is because it isn't like the 90's.
You don't shoot bugger all for about an hour in the opening, it heavily scripted, uses on-the-rails, super linear, you only carry two weapons and you use health regen and stuff.
 
I think the criticism is because its just not very good rather than what mechanics it may or may not be using (or not being a 90's like game or whatever).

The preview I saw on Giantbomb with them messing around with the demo looked like a game that was objective and technically just not good on its own merits.
 
I played the demo and it played like Duke Nukem. I don't like the two guns only thing though.
 
I loved the demo. Can't wait for the full game. I don't know what people are complaining about. The choice of two weapons is reminicent of specialty fighting. Team Fortress and other squad type games don't seem to have a problem.

Sounds like a bunch of kids and nerds are just being *****. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.



:doom: :doom: :doom:
 
This game has been in development for more than a decade, and Gearbox maintained the style of what it would have been had it been finished back then, only with improved graphics.
 
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"