Loki
Civilian
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2008
- Messages
- 319
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 11
because it would be funnyWhy bother making a live-action Family Guy movie in the first place?

because it would be funnyWhy bother making a live-action Family Guy movie in the first place?
Meg- Emma Roberts
(she not like totally ugly, but, she's pretty average looking, and can play dorky) with short hair, and glasses, it could work
i'm aware of stewies personality i do watch the show religiously
but come on you tell me jack black isn't funny
btw it's not a real movie it just for fun
Agree.this thread is dumb
Disagree......Family guy is dumb......
Agree.the guy who made the thread is REALLY Dumb....
That is not average lookingShe is way to cute to play Meg. Meg is dogged on for being ugly in every episode she is in.
On what planet is this girl "average looking"?
HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!I don't care who they cast for the rest of the characters as long as they cast the real life peter griffin
![]()
i don't get why people are saying this thread is stupid. no one cared about the "cast a live version of the simpsons" thread. its just for fun, i don't think the thread maker actually wants a live action movie
Nah....I'm definitely not up for something like that. There's a form of visual comedy that only the certain kind of animation can deliver.
-TNC
somehow i think a live action family guy movie would be more like date movie, epic movie, and meet the spartans.
this thread is dumb.....Family guy is dumb......the guy who made the thread is REALLY Dumb....
and Angus T Jones (Two and a Half men) as chris.......but then again since a Family guy movie would be messed up anyway...I don't think Age accuracy needs to be overly worried about so Jonah Hill would do fine too.
That is not average lookingShe is way to cute to play Meg. Meg is dogged on for being ugly in every episode she is in.