Lunar_Wolf
WTF face
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2006
- Messages
- 41,215
- Reaction score
- 6
- Points
- 31
What films do you think have remained pretty close to there source material when adapted to the big screen? This can be books, comics, TV shows etc
Yeah, this topic is a little weird. I mean, other than movies with a linear and short story being adapted page-for-page, it's a little difficult in determining or choosing films that remained close and if they were as close as they could get...and also a good movie.By close, do you mean as close as they could, or simply close?
I would consider the LOTR trilogy to be the closest anyone could get to the source and still deliver a top quality trilogy, but they made a fair few diversions from the source.
I thought David Fincher did a damn fine job of adapting Fight Club to film.
My kinda thread!
AbSOlutely
Also... Misery, American Psycho, Secret Window, The Mist, Sin City, No Country For Old Men, and I'll think of more later.
I expected more from the Mist, especially with the director...it was worth one viewing.
Yeah, it was OK. It was very faithful though, for the most part.
Also, it is worthy of a second viewing if you buy the special edition DVD, which allows you to watch the film in black and white, giving the film more of a B-movie vibe.
That's cool and strange at the same time.
A good adaption that wasn't close enough to the book is Bram Stoker's Dracula. I like it, I loved it even, but I would like to see a reimagining that is longer and less Keanu.
I'm not sure. I thought Keanu's wooden acting quite suited a turn-of-the-century Englishman with a stick up his arse.