Craig Wants a Gay Bond?

The Only Woj

Sidekick
Joined
Apr 3, 2004
Messages
2,757
Reaction score
0
Points
31
Craig wants a gay Bond


Daniel Craig has revealed that he is pressurising producers to include a gay scene in the next James Bond film.


The 'Casino Royale' star is riding a wave of popularity following the success of his first turn as the legendary superspy and is intent on revolutionising the franchise by making its lead character more unpredictable.


In addition to pushing for a gay scene in 'Bond 22', the British thesp has assured bosses that he is more than prepared to do a full frontal nude scene to please his male and female admirers.


He said: "Why not? I think in this day and age, fans would have accepted it.


"I mean, look at (British TV series) 'Doctor Who' - that has had gay scenes in it and no one blinks an eye."

http://movienews.virgin.net/Virgin/...viesNewsDetail/0,15384,1742885_movies,00.html

I'm going to go with "no thanks" to this one. I mean, I can definitely understand that Bond might have to swing that way to get information ... but I don't want to see male-on-male action.
 
Ah, why do people believe in this bull****?!?! Honestly...WHY?

Okay, a similiar story came about the time that 'Infamous' was release which Craig co-star in(infact he shared a man to man kiss in that flick). The article said Bond and Felix were going to share a kiss with one another in Casino Royale. I got a question...Did you see Bond kiss any man in Casino Royale? Hmm? NO. He was too busy swapping spit onscreen with the lovely Eva Green. The fact is this story is rubbish and should died a quick death. It is just a rehash of a previous tabloid article that prove false.

Here is a tip don't believe evrything you read...It's just another reason for people to fault in and hate on Daniel Craig.
 
^ It wouldn't surprise me one bit if this happened. The British are so over on homosexuality these days, they'll go to just about any lengths to prove it.
 
I really don't see a gay love scene ever happening. I don't see anything wrong with being gay, but James Bond simply is not gay. That's all there is to it.
 
AWWWW Prognosticator made a insulting generalization about British people, and The Englishman's gunna get in a fight with him

*annoying kids chanting in the backround*
FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT
 
FelixLeiter said:
I really don't see a gay love scene ever happening. I don't see anything wrong with being gay, but James Bond simply is not gay. That's all there is to it.
greatly said:yay:
 
anyone who has a problem with heroes being gay is living in the stoned age. grow up. its time to see producers have the balls to show more guys handling other guys balls on the screen. deal with it. things ahve changed. times are different. things are different. we're living in more mature times. and fyi james bond probalby IS gay in rl.
 
UltimateJustin said:
anyone who has a problem with heroes being gay is living in the stoned age. grow up. its time to see producers have the balls to show more guys handling other guys balls on the screen. deal with it. things ahve changed. times are different. things are different. we're living in more mature times. and fyi james bond probalby IS gay in rl.

Yes, that's what we need..guys handling guys balls up on the big screen!:whatever: :whatever: :whatever: :whatever: :whatever: :whatever:
and fyi, there IS NO James Bond in rl, gay or otherwise.
And the day Bendis decides the next story that will "forever change Spider-Man" is about Peter turning gay, I'll never collect another Marvel comic for as long as I live!:cmad:
 
This isn't true. It was a tabloid report put out around INFAMOUS' release, and now it's resurfacing.
 
This thread amused me therefore i cannot hate it:yay:
 
UltimateJustin said:
anyone who has a problem with heroes being gay is living in the stoned age. grow up. its time to see producers have the balls to show more guys handling other guys balls on the screen. deal with it. things ahve changed. times are different. things are different. we're living in more mature times. and fyi james bond probalby IS gay in rl.

When you say the stoned age, do you mean the 70's?
 
Gay Bond? Been there done that. It was called Mission Impossible.
 
UltimateJustin said:
anyone who has a problem with heroes being gay is living in the stoned age. grow up. its time to see producers have the balls to show more guys handling other guys balls on the screen. deal with it. things ahve changed. times are different. things are different. we're living in more mature times. and fyi james bond probalby IS gay in rl.
The gay community needs to come up with their own franchises instead of trying to rape established films with dedicated fan bases. You know, gay films like Top Gun.

It's like the whole blacksploitation trend of the 1970's. Blacula, the Wiz and whatnot. I'm not against a gay spy movie, I think it might be spectacular and fabulous, but instead of converting a well established heterosexual figure, come up with a completely new character.
 
UltimateJustin said:
anyone who has a problem with heroes being gay is living in the stoned age. grow up. its time to see producers have the balls to show more guys handling other guys balls on the screen. deal with it. things ahve changed. times are different. things are different. we're living in more mature times. and fyi james bond probalby IS gay in rl.

Dont be such a fool.

Nobody cares about gay heroes. If producers create such people then fine but dont be yelling at us to accept established characters who are partly famous for their sexual orientation (Bond) to all of a sudden be changed into homosexuals just because, "times are changing" and, "we're living in more mature times" :whatever: . That excuse is utter bs. Yes, times are changing but that doesn't mean its an invitation to turn straight men into gays. You need to grow up and apply some foward thinking before you start shooting your mouth off. FYI before you make ******ed and unfounded comments about Bond being gay, I suggest you go and learn the facts about the character. I personally feel homosexuality is wrong, disgusting and very very incorrect but I'm not homophobic and I accept that there are gay people who exist and some of them I respect and am fans of. Like I said, you want gay heroes, fine go ahead but not at the expense of established characters who are not gay.
 
Mr wyntt and the other guy, yes. Like I said, gay characters do exist and why not include them but I'll be very unhappy if they changed the sexual orientation of characters who are clearly not gay. However, I do like gay villains, in my mind they're more sinister. (volgin from mgs3, badass villain).
 
A gay Bond? That's the gayest thing I've ever heard. It's like asking if James Bond should give up being a secret agent and become a copy salesman. Being heterosexual is integral to the character. It's not like giving up Astin Martins for BMWs. It's like giving up Astin Martins for a fricken VW bug. Bond doesn't have a gay bone in his body.
 
OK the fiticonal character James Bond is straight. However he is a spy none the less therefore he has various roles to play so if there was a gay villian in the movie with critical info I could see M asking Bond to seduce the guy at all costs to save the world.

I mean that I can understand but to the Gay and Females fans you got him comming out of the surf in the dodgey swimwear! LOL just messing.
 
Meh, I don;t mind who he sleeps with. As long as he shoots them in the face and steals their car afterward.
 
Infinity9999x said:
AWWWW Prognosticator made a insulting generalization about British people, and The Englishman's gunna get in a fight with him

*annoying kids chanting in the backround*
FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT

LOL! :up: You're British humor has me rolling this early Wednesday morning! I'm not trying to offend anyone. I'm not the person who came up with this: I'm repeating a generalization that I'm hearing all the time!

No offense, really. But I don't want to see Bond Elton-Johning Around in his movies...that's just me.
 
hunter rider said:
This thread amused me therefore i cannot hate it:yay:

Ditto. It's worth the further humoring at the expense of the 'believers'.
 
Mr 7000+ said:
Dont be such a fool.

Nobody cares about gay heroes. If producers create such people then fine but dont be yelling at us to accept established characters who are partly famous for their sexual orientation (Bond) to all of a sudden be changed into homosexuals just because, "times are changing" and, "we're living in more mature times" :whatever: . That excuse is utter bs. Yes, times are changing but that doesn't mean its an invitation to turn straight men into gays. You need to grow up and apply some foward thinking before you start shooting your mouth off. FYI before you make ******ed and unfounded comments about Bond being gay, I suggest you go and learn the facts about the character. I personally feel homosexuality is wrong, disgusting and very very incorrect but I'm not homophobic and I accept that there are gay people who exist and some of them I respect and am fans of. Like I said, you want gay heroes, fine go ahead but not at the expense of established characters who are not gay.

First of all - a contradiction there. Anyone who calls it wrong would be indisposed to a mind steeped in a certain prejudice.

But I always give, or at least try, the benefit of the doubt to anyone.

Anyway. So uh, by your definition - a four year old, healthy, happy, loving and romantic relationship that I'm currently in would actually be wrong, disgusting and incorrect?

:confused:

And for the record - there is such a thing called bisexuality. Sexualiy isn't that rigid as some people are led to believe. One would be surprised as a point of fact. And even if it had to happen, it is called context.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"