Humphrey Bogart
Civilian
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2006
- Messages
- 362
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 11
Craig looks didn't seem to matter to the beautiful women he has dated. Obviously, there is something women dig about him.
Humphrey Bogart said:Craig looks didn't seem to matter to the beautiful women he has dated. Obviously, there is something women dig about him.
DOO BEE said:THEY MEAN BY ACTING YOU STUPID DUMB C**TS!!! DONT BAG IT UNTIL YOU SEE THE FULL MOVIE YOU ****ING ****S! YOU PPL ARE LIKE THE ********S WHO LOOK AT ME A JUDGE ME COZ I LOOK DIFFERENT! **** YOU ALL!
CRAIG KICKS EVERYONES ASS!
kit1982 said:Yeh his wallet, seriously judging by that Peter Stringfellow or Billy Bob Thornton could be Bond
pointman said:You know nothing.
kit1982 said:Oh sorry the almighty pointman please enlighten my foolish mind!
Seriously dude no need to be a d*ck about it, I'm a huge fan of Daniel Craig's but this whole he dated Sienna Miller blah blah blah really doesn't mean a thing just look at the people I mentioned.
pointman said:Comments suggesting that his wallet attracts girls is just ******ed. I'm not the one being a d*ck. Its as though you find it hard to accept that love isn't a respector of looks. Looks are not everything. There is such thing as charm and being a nice person, it also helps with the circles one such person rolls in. Take seal and Heidi, you think seal's looks bagged her? No. What about his wallet? Uh no, she doesn't need his money. Fact, there are "ugly" men without a penny to their name that bag hot chicks and vice versa. I've seen it.
kit1982 said:Oh dear god man, I highly doubt that Daniel Craig's public flings had anything to do with love seeing as how they lasted barely anytime! My point isn't that Love is a respector of looks, it's the fact that whenever anyone questions Daniel Craig's looks people use the age old argument that "hey he's banged Sienna Miller meaning that he isn't ugly" and whilst I don't think Craig is ugly or the like I don't buy that explanation, seeing as how it did little more than propel Ms Miller onto the main celebrity stage.
So don't come on here taking the moral highground about Love, having a fling with a Co-star for a few months is not love.
You seem to take my comments a little too personally are you infact Daniel Craig's mother? Seriously chill out.
pointman said:Firstly, I havn't said anything about Craig's relationship with women, let alone his relationship with miller, so save the moral high ground comments for someone else.
_achilles_ said:i can't wait for the movie...tonight is the premiere in London , i have to waith till november 23 before the movie hits the theaters here in the netherlands..i think Craig will do fine as bond and from what i have seen from the trailer and tv spots , you hear casino royale everywhere here : on the radio , tv , advertisments , poster....
kit1982 said:If your not talking about Craig then what the hell are you doing making such comments? What does that have to do with what my original comment if your reply has nowt to do ith him? Why if I make a comment about his relationships do you make a stinging attack that has nothing to do about them?
As I've said before my argument was that I disliked an age old comment that many have used (including yourself), I don't believe that because he had a high profile fling with an attractive woman that that automatically puts him high up in womens estimations, that's what my point has been all the time nothing more.
Seriously buddy I think we must have both lost one another!
_achilles_ said:i can't wait for the movie...tonight is the premiere in London , i have to waith till november 23 before the movie hits the theaters here in the netherlands..i think Craig will do fine as bond and from what i have seen from the trailer and tv spots , you hear casino royale everywhere here : on the radio , tv , advertisments , poster....
pointman said:I need you to get this right.
Of course I've been talking about Craig but a stinging attack?? Where?? I have never talked about Craig's personal relationship with the women he dates. I have spoken in collective terms that craig is not ugly as others have said but at the same time he's not a pretty boy. You made the comment that attractive women only go for craig because of his wallet, which is a narrow minded point of view, which btw is not fact. So before you start trying to retaliate by calling me Craig's mother or what ever, I want you to understand that all I'm doing is showing how rather silly your comment was.
As for wallcrawler, dont start because make no mistake I will bring
arms-house to you and to anyone else here on the hype who feels they're going to uneccessarily get at me.
"Passionately defending ugly guys"?
"dick me"?
I'm not the one sucking Brosnan off all day long, making countless threads and posts about Why Craig sucks because he's not a pretty boy. Do you even see me making threads about why Craig is an excellent choice? No because unlike d*ickheads like you and superfan I've got better things to do. What has been established and made abundantly clear is that your narrow-mindedness cant accept Craig as Bond which is fine but Craig is here as Bond and he'll be back. So instead of being losers, quit taking your crushed wet fantasy dreams about Bond as a pretty boy out on the rest of us who have supported craig, get over it and if you cant do that then just ***** off and go bash off to your Brosnan posters.