Mee
2 E's are better than 1
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2005
- Messages
- 18,896
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 33
Were you there?Reaper said:It was hotter than this in the middle ages, lmfao.....at u![]()


Were you there?Reaper said:It was hotter than this in the middle ages, lmfao.....at u![]()
Man-Thing said:![]()
I kinda hope global warming is true, I won't have to drive so far to the beach.![]()
Tangled Web said:It's 77 degrees outside and it's 1:33 AM.
Millions of people were getting killed in concentration camps, but that got no reaction. It wasn't until Pearl Harbor that we got involved.Man-Thing said:and your acting like chicken little.
so conservatives hid their head in the sand during WWII?
lol
Tangled Web said:Millions of people were getting killed in concentration camps, but that got no reaction. It wasn't until Pearl Harbor that we got involved.
= Burrying your head in the sand
Also, it doesn't change the fact that conservative's today arepretending Global Warming isn't real.
How can you explain the US being the only modern country who hasn't passed Kyoto? How dod you explain that the US cities that support Kyoto are notoriousley on the left?
They don't believe in science.sinewave said:or that the scientific community has embraced global warming as reality?
Tangled Web said:They don't believe in science.
Tangled Web said:Millions of people were getting killed in concentration camps, but that got no reaction. It wasn't until Pearl Harbor that we got involved.
= Burrying your head in the sand
How is it not ok to get involved in that war, but getting involved in Iraq is?Leto Atrides said:That was on an entirely different continent. The camps were in the middle of enemy territory, most closer to the other front. We were coming off of a bad depression. That's not the sort of situation that lends itself to entering a war.
Tangled Web said:How is it not ok to get involved in that war, but getting involved in Iraq is?
JLBats said:This doesn't make any sense, it was FDR who was president during WWII, a Democrat![]()
Leto Atrides said:They've switched roles over the years. When they first rose to power, circa Lincoln's presidency, Republicans were radical, and (at least Southern) Democrats entrenched and didn't like change.
It was in the late 70s and 80s that the Republicans really became affilitated with the "Religious Right", and conservative.
Leto Atrides said:I was talking about the Republican Party. Religious Conservatives have certainly been around for a while.
Say in the 50s, for example, Eisenhower wasn't going out of his way to support religious groups the way the party does now.
I'd gladly trade Nixon for Dwight D. Eisenhower.JLBats said:But he was conservative.
Although, some of the things he said were so liberal that I think the Democratic party of today would question making him a candidate.