Just a question.
i think we all agree that the star wars prequel trilogy really didn't add depth to the old one.
the biggest issue is continuity.
i mean there are so many inconsistentcies that its slightly frustrating.
the film is clearly trying to bring back the styling of x men 2. but in x men 2 hank mcoy is human.
orgins has emma as teen. Here emma is in her 30's.
so First Class retconns orgins and x3 but it ignores the inconsistent aspects of x2 and x1.
so i guess these films only add depth to magneto and professor x.
as long as they end up on the path visually by the time they reach the 3rd film. they're good.
i say we need to see a young cyclops, jean and storm and mystique at some point gives birth to nightcrawler, and magneto forms the brotherhood.
i think we all agree that the star wars prequel trilogy really didn't add depth to the old one.
the biggest issue is continuity.
i mean there are so many inconsistentcies that its slightly frustrating.
the film is clearly trying to bring back the styling of x men 2. but in x men 2 hank mcoy is human.
orgins has emma as teen. Here emma is in her 30's.
so First Class retconns orgins and x3 but it ignores the inconsistent aspects of x2 and x1.
so i guess these films only add depth to magneto and professor x.
as long as they end up on the path visually by the time they reach the 3rd film. they're good.
i say we need to see a young cyclops, jean and storm and mystique at some point gives birth to nightcrawler, and magneto forms the brotherhood.