The director was quoted saying the skull on the shirt was " too comicbooky " if that makes any sense.
I just cant get past the fact that he would make a comment such as this when he is working on a film that is based on a comic book character. Sure he didnt have to make it 100% faithfull which it is far from. But do you really have to give your reasoning for leaving the trademark symbol that identifies the character like Superman's S as Too Comicbooky? God that annoys me.
I can understand it. When he made Punisher comics were still very much in "haha" land and there was no internet so the fans couldn't *****.
I *guess* he was trying to make a serious action film and thought the skull would be too hokey. Whatever. His budget was the hokey part.
Blade, X-Men, and then Spidey 1 changed all of that.
I wonder what movie he'd have made if he'd gotten the green light right after X-Men hit it big.
A lot of people want to knock this movie....but considering Marvel's early track record, this is one of the better ones.
I haven't seen it in forever but I think I'm gonna buy a copy. I've seen far worse action movies.
It was lame that they only showed the skull on his knife though. WTF?
Like this film would have made less cash if he'd had the skull on his shirt.
Have you seen Predator?I dont see any difference between that and stuff like Arnold covering himself in mud at the end of Predator or whatever
Funny thing....he hasn't directed squat in a long time....but he's listed as an editor on X3.
Like this film would have made less cash if he'd had the skull on his shirt.
Steven Goldblatt is considered one of the best action movie editors of all-time by many, including James Cameron.