TLH
Hypnotized
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2006
- Messages
- 4,428
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 56
I'm at least hoping for a story as good as the "X-Men" film had or better. I will be content.![]()
Mmm...not sure about that.
I'm at least hoping for a story as good as the "X-Men" film had or better. I will be content.![]()
Critics don't like entertainment they like to look smart by only giving excellent reviews to independent movies and movies that other critics don't like...Anything over 30% in Rotten Tomatoes is fine by me. I don't expect this to be critically acclaimed, i just want it to be fan-approved.
Critics don't like entertainment they like to look smart by only giving excellent reviews to independent movies and movies that other critics don't like...
Lol.
Anything over 30% in Rotten Tomatoes is fine by me. I don't expect this to be critically acclaimed, i just want it to be fan-approved.
Hence why Spider-man 2 didnt get nominated for any of the real oscars, only for a few technical ones. And even Roger Ebert said that was a Best Picture ish movie xD.
Spiderman 2 didn't deserve any real Oscars.
Like at all.
Honestly, I wouldnt mind seeing the movie being shot buy use of Rotoscoping, the same way that "A Scanner Darkly" was shot. It would give the film more of an anime look while still retaining realistic looking characters
Well, still, given the extra time, the movie should be good. It gives them all a chance to better the product.
Honestly, I wouldnt mind seeing the movie being shot buy use of Rotoscoping, the same way that "A Scanner Darkly" was shot. It would give the film more of an anime look while still retaining realistic looking characters