Octoberist
point blank
- Joined
- May 13, 2005
- Messages
- 46,465
- Reaction score
- 17
- Points
- 33
if it's done right, I'm all for it. at the sametime, i'm weary of shooting the entire movie infront of a blue screen. I'm sure Zodiac wasn't ALL blue screen.
isnt for everything in a movie?if it's done right, I'm all for it. at the sametime, i'm weary of shooting the entire movie infront of a blue screen. I'm sure Zodiac wasn't ALL blue screen.

if it's done right, I'm all for it. at the sametime, i'm weary of shooting the entire movie infront of a blue screen. I'm sure Zodiac wasn't ALL blue screen.

Weary...
It never took off. Even i'm surprised by this actually. I would've thought that after 300 studios would've seriously considered shooting more pics against blue/green screens because of the cost reduction. But it never reallt took off.
2002 SW AOTC
2004 Sky Capt
2005 Sin City & SW ROTS
2007 300
2008 Speed Racer
2009 Avatar
2010 Tron Legacy
Yes each year there is a movie that's totally shot against a blue screen but it's just ONE movie . not several.
And you are right about Zodiac not being a 100% blue screen movie.

Have you read EMPIRE magazine's article on this topic ?
As for the article , i don't understand why they don't shoot the pic against a blue screen. It reduces the cost greatly.
^
It was pretty generic Lynch, what did you find weird beside the extreme short cuts made in the story ( weirding module, navigator folding space or the "magic" ending ) ?
The movie is the first two novels but it was very condensed and many short cuts were made ( see my previous post ).
it's just the first book (and about 60% of it Lynch's version was already too weird.
it's just the first book (and about 60% of it
)