Mr Sparkle
Avenger
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2005
- Messages
- 14,516
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
hippy fascist said:The fact that what I've said is directly followed by a statment from a muslim backing up what I said.
No interpretation requires it. Only mysogenistic governments that want to keep women down
Game.Set.Match.
the fact that AFTER your post someone posted in agreement?
are you insane? what, you knew a muslim was going to present your evidence for you? you coward you didn't know and as always don't know what you're talking about and now resort to cite dangermouse as if you for one second understood the coversation we had.
the burqa is based on Hijab, therefore based on religion, you mistake a sane conversation with an oposing viewpoint with agreement.
we DIDN'T agree.
he said Islam is not open to interpretation like catholicism.
but that's what his belief IS, like Christians believe catholics are wrong and viceversa.
idiot.
like I said, do your research adn then shut the **** up.
hippy fascist said:dude now you're really grasping at straws.
Sparkle: "Mr dangermouse, do you think that maybe there's a 1 in a million chance that the crap I've been spouting thus far might actually have some slight basis in reality. Please say it is, I so sick of getting into arguments where I don't know what I'm talking about and looking like a moron."
DangerMouse: "no"
LOL, I like how you never adress points, just do a little story to hide the fact that you know nothing and are just trying (and failing) to look as if you do.
I also love how you completely missed the point of our conversation.
the Burqa is deemed religious by those who wear it.
as Dangermouse put it HE wouldn't deem it religious but the people who use it do.
as I have shown, unlike you , there's research to back up my statement (law of Hijab and such) and now, like a moron you're trying to use my conversation with dangermouse as foundation for your non-argument.
but see:
Danger Mouse said:I wouldn't. They could, but they'd be wrong.
sorry if you missed this, and sorry of you failed to understand the conversation *****ebag, but again, you're out of your depth here.