Elijah Wood claims Hollywood child abuse ring is real

[Slushy]

From what I can tell he's just a typical run-of-the-mill family man.

And a certified pr*ck, lol. #SpiderDouche

 

[BestGirl]

Yes.

That right there is a tremendous red flag.

 

[Greens]

That right there is a tremendous red flag.

Depends on how you look at it. Having kids over at Neverland was his way of life. Maybe he wasn't prepared to give that up just to save face in public opinion.

 

[BestGirl]

Perhaps, but a grown man hanging out with children for fun is already rather alarming; a grown man continuing to hang out with children after one has already accused him of molesting him is on another level of creepy.

 

[Greens]

Perhaps, but a grown man hanging out with children for fun is already rather alarming; a grown man continuing to hang out with children after one has already accused him of molesting him is on another level of creepy.

It's not like Michael Jackson was just a regular Joe schmo, though. It's widely believed that MJ was socially immature and saw children as his peers. We consider it alarming because we immediately go to the worst case scenario.

 

[Octoberist]

Speaking of predators, Corey Feldman recently talked about the many victims in Hollywood, that was first brought up by Elijah.

I'm not able to name names. People are frustrated, people are angry, they want to know how is this happening and they want answers and they turn to me and they say, "Why don't you be a man and stand up and name names and stop hiding and being a coward?" I have to deal with that, which is not pleasant, especially given the fact that I would love to name names. I'd love to be the first to do it. But unfortunately California conveniently enough has a statute of limitations that prevents that from happening. Because if I were to go and mention anybody's name I would be the one that would be in legal problems and I'm the one that would be sued. We should be talking to the district attorneys and the lawmakers in California, especially because this is where the entertainment industry is and this is a place where adults have more direct and inappropriate connection with children than probably anywhere else in the world.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/corey-feldman-elijah-wood-hollywood-897403

 

[Defacto]

It's not like Michael Jackson was just a regular Joe schmo, though. It's widely believed that MJ was socially immature and saw children as his peers. We consider it alarming because we immediately go to the worst case scenario.

That immaturity is bull. He had to make business decisions and take care of his musical endevours. That's not immaturity. He had porn magazines all around. That's not immaturity. He was married twice, as he tried to portray himself as a normal family man who makes kids. Only those marriages where to sham and he didn't even "make" his kids himself the natural way.

And you can see a weird pattern. He befriends a pre-pubescent child, "lives his childhood" with him and once the kid is too old, it's time for a new kid to "live his childhood" with. Just look at the list of kids he was associated with. Even Corey Feldman said he was emotionally hurt because Michael dumped him when he grew up. I guess they were able to have some sort of friendship afterwards, but that was MJ's thing. Use them while they are young. Man was bad.

 

[chamber-music]

It's not like Michael Jackson was just a regular Joe schmo, though. It's widely believed that MJ was socially immature and saw children as his peers. We consider it alarming because we immediately go to the worst case scenario.

Will.I.Am and Russell Crowe were told stories about their strange interaction with Jackson on The Graham Norton Show recently. MJ used to prank call Russell Crowe despite the fact Crowe didn't know him.

Jackson's upbringing definitely messed him up psychologically.

Speaking of predators, Corey Feldman recently talked about the many victims in Hollywood, that was first brought up by Elijah.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/corey-feldman-elijah-wood-hollywood-897403

I feel bad for Feldman. He is in a no win situation. I'm not sure how people can cover this stuff up and sleep at night. The people who protect these scumbags are every bit as terrible as them in my opinion.

 

[MessiahDecoy123]

This truly would not be surprise. Where there's smoke, there's usually fire imo. Like Bill Cosby. Not about child abuse but abuse anyway. And the biggest and the most obvious example, Michael Jackson.

I'm pretty sure he was molested when he was a kid and he continued that behaviour as a grownup.

This pic might be being taken out of context.

One kid is wearing swim trunks.

The main difference between Cosby accusers and MJ accusers, the MJ accusers were happy take money to drop the allegations.

If someone raped my kid, I'm not dropping the charges for any amount of money.

 

[Defacto]

This pic might be being taken out of context.

One kid is wearing swim trunks.

The main difference between Cosby accusers and MJ accusers, the MJ accusers were happy take money to drop the allegations.

If someone raped my kid, I'm not dropping the charges for any amount of money.

In case of MJ's 1994 accuser, his parents were really ******. But the father viewed his sone as "damaged goods", so why not at least take the money then. MJ's reputation was also pretty much destroyed too, which is what Evan Chandler wanted also. Besides, MJ's camp was more than happy to pay up, after the pictures of MJ's dick were taken by the police. The description was a match, by the way. Why do you think in the last case MJ's defence fought to not have those pictures includede as evidence? Also, read my post above.

 

[chamber-music]

If you have a unwinnable case sometimes taking the money is the best your going to get. It is better than losing and then having a huge legal bill debt. The discomfort of reliving the abuse and scrutiny of a trial may want people to take the easier option as well.

I think most people would prefer a conviction but I can understand why sometimes they would take money.

 

[Warhammer]

You're right. Losing a case plus having the legal debt is salt on a festering wound. I'd take the money too. The hit on ___ celebrity's reputation is the best consolation one can get sometimes.

 

[MessiahDecoy123]

Legal bills?

The victim doesn't have to pay the prosecutor in a criminal trial.

 

[DJ_KiDDvIcIOUs]

In case of MJ's 1994 accuser, his parents were really ******. But the father viewed his sone as "damaged goods", so why not at least take the money then. MJ's reputation was also pretty much destroyed too, which is what Evan Chandler wanted also. Besides, MJ's camp was more than happy to pay up, after the pictures of MJ's dick were taken by the police. The description was a match, by the way. Why do you think in the last case MJ's defence fought to not have those pictures includede as evidence? Also, read my post above.

So it was a match huh? What position did you hold in that investigation since you have such intimate knowledge of the proceedings?

 

[Warhammer]

Legal bills?

The victim doesn't have to pay the prosecutor in a criminal trial.

Even private prosecution? Sorry, not legal saavy.

 

[DJ_KiDDvIcIOUs]

Even private prosecution? Sorry, not legal saavy.

There is no such thing as private prosecution, that would be considered a civil case. In a case like MJ's anytime someone settles out of court for money they then agree not to cooperate in the state's prosecution of the case and if there is no witness the state then usually drops it. Not always though since sometimes they do have enough evidence to move forward with a case but that hardly happens with celebrities.

2 well known criminal and civil cases would be the OJ trial. He was found not guilty in the criminal case but then lost the civil case which was privately funded and had to pay out damages to the plaintiffs.

 

[Rodrigo90]

Radar online listed some already known abusers

Tobey Maguire and Leonardo DiCaprio and mentor was a surprise.

Some serious messed up stuff is going on and the fact people are covering it up for their own selfish self interest is horrible.

 

[Galactus123]

In case of MJ's 1994 accuser, his parents were really ******. But the father viewed his sone as "damaged goods", so why not at least take the money then. MJ's reputation was also pretty much destroyed too, which is what Evan Chandler wanted also. Besides, MJ's camp was more than happy to pay up, after the pictures of MJ's dick were taken by the police. The description was a match, by the way. Why do you think in the last case MJ's defence fought to not have those pictures includede as evidence? Also, read my post above.

Actually they didn't match. The description said that he was circumcised. He wasn't.

 

[Rodrigo90]

A report from the LA Times in 93 or 94 stated the description was nowhere near a match. The splotches were wrong.
And if they were a match, apparently this supposed dark spot near the tip of MJ's penis that was the most telling thing, wouldn't that have been enough to go on?

And it's also a fact that MJ's dermatologist, who tended to his skin condition, including his private parts, was a friend of Evan Chandler. She stopped working for Michael not long before the allegations hit. Her name even appears in one of the sketches of MJ's penis supposedly made by Jordan. Suspicious.

 

[Golgo-13]

couldn't someone leak it to anonymous or something? why not shine a light on this stuff/name names; if only for the sake of the victims?

That's what i'm thinking. In the age of social media, leaking this will at least prompt some sort of investigation. The power of the net can give anyone a voice in this day and age, seeing as how something like this would certainly go viral.

And it's also a fact that MJ's dermatologist, who tended to his skin condition, including his private parts, was a friend of Evan Chandler. She stopped working for Michael not long before the allegations hit. Her name even appears in one of the sketches of MJ's penis supposedly made by Jordan. Suspicious.

WTF?!

 

[Rodrigo90]

I think the name was Orietta, a personal assistant of some sort. Why Jordan wrote her name down in his description, I don't know. But this Victor Gutierrez, who was after Michael for years, had her as one of his sources. He was the one who apparently pushed Evan into thinking Michael was a pedophile.

 

[BestGirl]

It's not like Michael Jackson was just a regular Joe schmo, though. It's widely believed that MJ was socially immature and saw children as his peers. We consider it alarming because we immediately go to the worst case scenario.

I read a book about the Catholic Church sex scandal, and unfortunately that description fits abusive priests to a tee. They tended to be on the same emotional level as their victims.

 

[BestGirl]

Speaking of predators, Corey Feldman recently talked about the many victims in Hollywood, that was first brought up by Elijah.



http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/corey-feldman-elijah-wood-hollywood-897403

Is it true a person could be sued for claiming someone sexually abused them in the past if the SOL had run out?

 

[Greens]

Is it true a person could be sued for claiming someone sexually abused them in the past if the SOL had run out?

Without solid evidence, the alleged abuser can file a defamation lawsuit and probably win. The SOL doesn't have any effect on that.

 

[Pink Ranger]

Is it true a person could be sued for claiming someone sexually abused them in the past if the SOL had run out?

If Corey Feldman today voices the accusation that someone sexually abused him, that person could sue him because the supposed offending act is the accusation that happens today, not the actual sexual abuse itself. So there is no statute of limitations, unless the accused person waits for several years before launching the defamation or libel suit.

That stated, while the alleged abuser cannot be prosecuted, should this theoretical defamation suit go to an actual trial, Feldman has the advantage of basically being able to tell the whole story up on the witness stand. I am not a lawyer, but it's my understanding that in tort/civil trials, there are fewer limitations as to publicity and/or allowable evidence that you get in criminal trials, so he can really let loose and get justice just by destroying someone's reputation. The problem is whether he can afford to be involved in a civil suit for the length of time it takes to go to trial.