Deserana
2005/2008/2012
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2011
- Messages
- 5,862
- Reaction score
- 42
- Points
- 58
Whether positive to negative or vice-versa is there a film that made you change your view of an Actor/Director?
For me recently it's Brad Pitt. I know it may be a little weird but outside of Fight Club I wasn't particularly that fond of him as an actor. He never bothered me and he certainly wasn't bad but I never really liked him. As well as some rumors that were floating around that he wasn't particularly a nice guy to work with (apparently there is a film about an egomaniac film star which is based on an experience with him though that story has also been slated as a myth).
But yeah he just wasn't for me. But after World War Z I see him completely different. Now this wasn't to do with his work on screen but more off screen. Rarely have I seen such a big star push and push and be passionate about big budget blockbuster as much as Pitt did. He fought for the rights to the novel initially. Reportedly had on set feuds with director Marc Forster (to the point where they wouldn't talk) about the third act. Normally that would be bad but after watching the film and hearing about what the third act was this long-fought third act was a LOT better. So he clearly didn't just role with it like many would. And then pushed and pushed and pushed promotion for it after many had labelled it a guaranteed flop. Visiting multiple theatres unannounced in one day across different states.
Plus he also carried the film which always helps. I don't think it would have been as good without him.
Anyway have any of you had the same feeling about anyone?
For me recently it's Brad Pitt. I know it may be a little weird but outside of Fight Club I wasn't particularly that fond of him as an actor. He never bothered me and he certainly wasn't bad but I never really liked him. As well as some rumors that were floating around that he wasn't particularly a nice guy to work with (apparently there is a film about an egomaniac film star which is based on an experience with him though that story has also been slated as a myth).
But yeah he just wasn't for me. But after World War Z I see him completely different. Now this wasn't to do with his work on screen but more off screen. Rarely have I seen such a big star push and push and be passionate about big budget blockbuster as much as Pitt did. He fought for the rights to the novel initially. Reportedly had on set feuds with director Marc Forster (to the point where they wouldn't talk) about the third act. Normally that would be bad but after watching the film and hearing about what the third act was this long-fought third act was a LOT better. So he clearly didn't just role with it like many would. And then pushed and pushed and pushed promotion for it after many had labelled it a guaranteed flop. Visiting multiple theatres unannounced in one day across different states.
Plus he also carried the film which always helps. I don't think it would have been as good without him.
Anyway have any of you had the same feeling about anyone?