pretty sure i wasn't the first to mention whedon. but i get it you're emotional.
You obviously have comprehension problems or are choosing to pick what you want to understand, but simply bringing up Whedon is obviously not what I'm talking about, it's bringing in completely unrelated crap into this thread concerning rights and characters you obviously know nothing about and have an opinion on based completely off of pettiness.
still not a troll. and please and explain to me what in the blue **** they have to do with ultron. explain to me how that doesn't seem tacked on when they're going to be antagonists initial in a film, where they have nothing to do with the big baddie. since you're so dead set on setting me straight, guy.
Wow, how about you wait and see how the plot works?? There's seriously something wrong with you if you can't comprehend what constructing a story entails. You don't know if they don't have anything to do with Ultron, because you have not seen the script or movie. It's already clear you're simply set against them being in the movie and are finding any way to delude yourself into thinking Whedon and Marvel are simply doing this to stick it to Fox. "Whedon said they're only in it for their powers!! Oh that's not it? Well they they have nothing to do with Ultron!!!" You've already exposed yourself.
so singer should have told everyone every single detail about the film. that would have appeased some of you. good to know.
That is not even the point or what I'm getting at. Nor am I one of those who even think he never had him in the script. But it's easy to see how people take it the wrong way when he waited till they were 2-3 months into production to cast a character just two weeks after Whedon announced the same character was in his movie. Sucks for Singer, but that's how it goes. And that's not the only or even primary reason Singer is getting flack, regardless of if that's how you want to play it off as. The Quicksilver in his movie is pretty much nothing like the one from the comics whatsoever beyond superspeed, and he will clearly have little more than 5-10 minutes of screentime. Singer set himself up for criticism and it's well warranted.
fox owns the rights to the mutants don't they? seems like it would have bee the honorable thing to respect the continuity.
"Honorable thing"?? Right. There's a reason Marvel has the rights to the twins and it's because the vast majority of their history in the comics lies with the Avengers. They've literally been in hundreds of Avengers comics and have barely been in more than a couple handful of X-Men comics. The only reason Fox has rights to them is because they're mutants. If Fox gave a crap about being "honorable" then they wouldn't be trying to use characters who have very little establish history with their related film franchise...but it's not about that. If a studio has rights to use a character then they can use them. And it's clear Fox doesn't care about the history of the twins given what Quicksilver is in DOFP, and a lot of that is because they can't use most of their history.
so because their biographies have been retconned, magneto being their father is irrelevant? there's that continuity thing showing up when it's convenient. nope.
Yes just ignore the context behind everything I posted. As I said explicitly there, my point is that Magento being their father is IRRELEVANT to the twin's history with the Avengers and their classic portrayal. But only people who knew what they were talking about and read the comics would understand this, so I don't expect you to and I'm not going to bother trying to explain it to you again.
And what the hell does continuity even have to do with any of this? The MCU is in a completely different continuity from the comics. Don't use terms you don't understand.
