You obviously have comprehension problems or are choosing to pick what you want to understand, but simply bringing up Whedon is obviously not what I'm talking about, it's bringing in completely unrelated crap into this thread concerning rights and characters you obviously know nothing about and have an opinion on based completely off of pettiness.
i was talking about whedon. he's directing the movie. the discussion, which YOU have prolonged, james williams bottomtooth,
was about the characters he's having in the movie, james williams bottomtooth.
Wow, how about you wait and see how the plot works?? There's seriously something wrong with you if you can't comprehend what constructing a story entails.You don't know if they don't have anything to do with Ultron, because you have not seen the script or movie.
again I'm fine, thanks for your concern mr.bottomtooth. and yes I'll wait, but until then, can you recommend any comic books that would alluded to any history those three characters might have together, since the twins history seems so important regarding their inclusion into that franchise.
It's already clear you're simply set against them being in the movie and are finding any way to delude yourself into thinking Whedon and Marvel are simply doing this to stick it to Fox.
I'm actually not, dr.freud, because there isn't anything i can do about whedon including quicksilver in the film. it isn't as if fox didn't have the chance to include him before, and it isn't as if wb didn't have a chance to make a flash movie.
"Whedon said they're only in it for their powers!! Oh that's not it? Well they they have nothing to do with Ultron!!!" You've already exposed yourself.
exposed myself as what? someone who used common sense about ulrton and the twins, and someone who some how manage to process the information straight from whedon's mouth?
http://www.latenightwithjimmyfallon...e-avengers-and-much-ado-about-nothing/n37370/
That is not even the point or what I'm getting at. Nor am I one of those who even think he never had him in the script. But it's easy to see how people take it the wrong way when he waited till they were 2-3 months into production to cast a character just two weeks after Whedon announced the same character was in his movie. Sucks for Singer, but that's how it goes. And that's not the only or even primary reason Singer is getting flack, regardless of if that's how you want to play it off as.
what is he getting flack for if it isn't about quicksilver exactly? making the best x-mens films aside from first class?
The Quicksilver in his movie is pretty much nothing like the one from the comics whatsoever beyond superspeed, and he will clearly have little more than 5-10 minutes of screentime. Singer set himself up for criticism and it's well warranted.
i haven't seen AoU yet, but somehow you've manage to watch days of future past. be honest, are you kitty pride?
"Honorable thing"?? Right. There's a reason Marvel has the rights to the twins and it's because the vast majority of their history in the comics lies with the Avengers.
marvel can use them as can fox, minister of truth.
The only reason Fox has rights to them is because they're mutants.
which they bought, from marvel.
If Fox gave a crap about being "honorable" then they wouldn't be trying to use characters who have very little establish history with their related film franchise.
if fox had any "honor" they should not make anymore movies so that the rights can go back to marvel. who cares if they paid marvel money for those characters? amirite?
..but it's not about that.
no?
If a studio has rights to use a character then they can use them.
which marvel and fox have, but singer is the jerk in this equation.
[ And it's clear Fox doesn't care about the history of the twins given what Quicksilver is in DOFP, and a lot of that is because they can't use most of their history.
its a film about many characters, as is AoU. it's not an 8 hour epic about the lives of the twins. they don't need "most of their history" to care about their history.
Yes just ignore the context behind everything I posted. As I said explicitly there, my point is that Magento being their father is IRRELEVANT to the twin's history with the Avengers and their classic portrayal
really, so they disown their father whenever they go "avenge"
And what the hell does continuity even have to do with any of this? The MCU is in a completely different continuity from the comics. Don't use terms you don't understand.
and yet you keep rambling on about their history with the avengers. go figure.
you've took the time to write theses in response to my posts. i don't believe you, mr.bottomtooth.
But only people who knew what they were talking about and read the comics would understand this, so I don't expect you to and I'm not going to bother trying to explain it to you again.
because it's clear you don't know what you're talking about on a multitude of levels and likely aren't cooth enough to admit it and accept someone who DOES know what they're talking about correcting you.
i know enough to form my own opinion and if that bothers you, it makes me extremely happy given with tone of your posts.
