Girl arrest for dropping a cake.

[Zoken]

That's exactly how I feel. Unless you twist the situation into the girl being this freaking mastermind who set this up, then there is no way this situation seems justified. No matter how you put it.

my scenario made her seem like a mastermind? I thought it just made her seem like a *****... oh, that's right, because that's all she'd need to be. an ill-behaved teenager... but those don't exist do they. There's no way a teenager girl would ever act in a snotty and/or stuck up manner, provoke a guard, resist detainment in such a away that she contributes to whatever injury she sustained, then exagerate what happened afterward. No way would any teenage girl do that.

 

[Sloth7d]

anyone can buy a cast and etc. at a medical supply shop. and how about spraining or twisting her wrist. Just because it's in a cast doesn't mean it's broken.

You make a good point about my "Japan" comment Addendum

So, basically you think this girl is some "evil master mind" who wants to get "the loving well mannered guard" arrested. So she's taking court action against him with no medical record of the injury at all, not to mention it seems no one has found out about the girl lying about a broken wrist yet. Get a clue.

 

[Sloth7d]

my scenario made her seem like a mastermind? I thought it just made her seem like a *****... oh, that's right, because that's all she'd need to be. an ill-behaved teenager... but those don't exist do they. There's no way a teenager girl would ever act in a snotty and/or stuck up manner, provoke a guard, resist detainment in such a away that she contributes to whatever injury she sustained, then exagerate what happened afterward. No way would any teenage girl do that.

And there's obviously no way a school police officer could be so corrupt as to intentionally injure a teenage girl or abuse his power over her , especially because she's black. I'm sure we can forget about Rodney King, Tupac, and O.J. Simpson. Let's forget about the fact that this was an accident and the officer clearly over reacted. And no matter what the scenario, breaking her arm or arresting her over dropped cake is clearly an abusal if power. But no. Corrupt cops don't exist. They aren't real.

 

[bell110]

How do we know it was made on purpose? Last time I checked, a person that is carrying something and drops it through tripping, losing their footing, or bumping into something (a table that you couldn't see, another person, or you're going through a door as another person is using that same door going in) are considered "accidents"

How do we know it wasn't on purpose? Yes, things happen, maybe you loose your footing or bump into something. But, she was being arrested for something. You can't be arrested for droping cake. So, MAYBE she did something illegal, like physically fighting with the security guard. You can't put your hands on a security guard, no matter how "right" you may think you are.

 

[bullets]

if she put her hands on him she must of felt threatened

 

[Zoken]

And there's obviously no way a school police officer could be so corrupt as to intentionally injure a teenage girl or abuse his power over her , especially because she's black. I'm sure we can forget about Rodney King, Tupac, and O.J. Simpson. Let's forget about the fact that this was an accident and the officer clearly over reacted. And no matter what the scenario, breaking her arm or arresting her over dropped cake is clearly an abusal if power. But no. Corrupt cops don't exist. They aren't real.

Don't get me started on Rodney King, I don't know Jack about Tupac, and Simpson is guilty as SIN and everyone knows that these days.

So let me follow your line of thought.

Teenage girl drops cake in the cafeteria, is asked to clean it up, complies readily and politely. Is made to do it twice more despite doing a sufficient job the first time., the fourth time she refuses, and this refusal sends the officer into such a rage that he decides to break her arm. And this gives him what benifit? With this theory he had already humiliated her by making her clean it twice again, so that wasn't necessary. And if you take the story at face value, she was running off in tears, embarassed, so he didn't need to save face from impuned authority. Then realize he's been video taped on a cell phone he suddenly realizes he's done something wrong and confiscates it, and the filmer, and for fun the filmer's sister, ignoring the hundred+ other witnesses. Then when the mother comes in and threatens litigation, he arrests her because that will stop litigation...

Holes in this little plot...
What benifit or motivation did the officer have, even with your "*******-racist" theory going on?
Why confiscate the camera? If he is a racist, then he thinks he's done the right thing. If not, there are over a hundred witnesses watching, so confiscating the camera does Jack-all. Same as detaining the sister.
Also, why would he need to, with the story all over the media, he's yet to be fired, so his job wasn't at risk.

 

[Zoken]

if she put her hands on him she must of felt threatened

He's talking about when he detained her. More than likely what we saw on that video was not his immediate reaction to "I'm not cleaning it up again".

 

[bell110]

And there's obviously no way a school police officer could be so corrupt as to intentionally injure a teenage girl or abuse his power over her , especially because she's black. I'm sure we can forget about Rodney King, Tupac, and O.J. Simpson. Let's forget about the fact that this was an accident and the officer clearly over reacted. And no matter what the scenario, breaking her arm or arresting her over dropped cake is clearly an abusal if power. But no. Corrupt cops don't exist. They aren't real.

Intentionally injure her? No evidence of that.

Rodney King? Not this case. This isn't a Rodney King type case.

Tupac? White people had nothing to do with that. It was black on black.

O.J.? OJ basically admitted to killing his wife and Goldman. How does that make black people feel? All this time they defended him for the sole purpose because he was black. NOW, it turns out he actually DID kill his wife. Man, talking about eating crow.

And, we don't know why she was being arrested. Not for dropping cake because you can't be arrested for that. Maybe assaulting a security guard? That's an arrestable offence. Like I said, we only saw at the most 15 seconds of someones camra phone, so we don't know that the arrest was unjustified.

 

[Zoken]

That's the problem with everyone having a damn camera these days. Someone sees twelve seconds of what's happened and they think they know the whole story. Who here knew that hitting was not the police officers first tactic? Who here knew that after being tasered, Rodney King got back up? Who here knew that his behavior that night fit with that of someone who had been using PCP, which would have meant he posed a signifigant risk to the officers? Anyone? Anyone? I'm not saying he deserved what he got, I'm saying the officers reaction to seeing him was not to immediately take out their batons and start beating him. they did attempt to subdue him other ways and he refused to be subdued. think about this; His lawyers wouldn't even let him take the stand in his own case.

 

[bell110]

I wasn't here when the VT shootings happend, but I wonder how many people compained that nothing more was done and that security was too lacked.

 

[Mike_D202]

Somebody HERE goes to that same school and was present that day, he said it was a food fight and she threw the cake on purpose. I dont know why some people still think it was an accident.

 

[Zoken]

Mikey, I could kiss you.

 

[sithgoblin]

Somebody HERE goes to that same school and was present that day, he said it was a food fight and she threw the cake on purpose. I dont know why some people still think it was an accident.

Even then, you give them a detention. You don't break their arm.

 

[Zoken]

Why do people keep talking like he walked up to her grabbed her arm and slammed it down on his knee. It was not his intention to break her arm, I think even the thickest heads can agree on that.

It isn't even confirmed that her arm was broken.

any injury to her arm was likely the result of her struggling against the officer arresting, which means she is equally to blame for her broken are as the officer is.

 

[Mike_D202]

Handcuffing isnt supposed to tickle, so I'm sure she was a little in pain. She probably over-dramatized the pain and ended up in a cast to blow up the news event...maybe even to gain a little $$$ from the school. I'm sure mommy had a little say in that.

 

[teseract]

I went to great schools that taught me how to be a polite and well mannered person. They taught me tht violence is never a good idea, but some times it's the only idea.

Bruises? Please, you act like this is some every day thing. and, out of curiosity, which do you think will be more effect if in detering poor behavior, boring the kid for an hour, or making associate the behavior with physical pain, but in a way that causes no lasting physical damage? Which one do you think is most effective?

Cute, maybe we should start caning kids again. I bet some teacher would love to bend little boys and girls over their knees and give them 20 with the good old rod on their naked behinds.

 

[LexCorp]

Cute, maybe we should start caning kids again. I bet some teacher would love to bend little boys and girls over their knees and give them 20 with the good old rod on their naked behinds.

Dirty minds lol

 

[CristoTheSecond]

Why do people keep talking like he walked up to her grabbed her arm and slammed it down on his knee. It was not his intention to break her arm, I think even the thickest heads can agree on that.

It isn't even confirmed that her arm was broken.

any injury to her arm was likely the result of her struggling against the officer arresting, which means she is equally to blame for her broken are as the officer is.

It's a freakish mutation of Kritish and Wilhelm!

RUNNN!

Don't you think it's racist to assume that in every situation where a black person is involved, the black person is automatically guilty?

I mean, people were saying that the crime where all these white guys tortured and raped this black girl for days WAS NOT racially motivated (until it was later proven to be so) and yet, all we REALLY know in this case is that she was slammed down for dropping a cake and called a "nappy head" and we automatically assume she's the bad guy.

I sense a lot of latent white racism here, but of couse nobody's going to admit it.

 

[bullets]

its not our fault shes black

 

[bell110]

It's a freakish mutation of Kritish and Wilhelm!

RUNNN!

Don't you think it's racist to assume that in every situation where a black person is involved, the black person is automatically guilty?

I mean, people were saying that the crime where all these white guys tortured and raped this black girl for days WAS NOT racially motivated (until it was later proven to be so) and yet, all we REALLY know in this case is that she was slammed down for dropping a cake and called a "nappy head" and we automatically assume she's the bad guy.

I sense a lot of latent white racism here, but of couse nobody's going to admit it.

Isn't it racist to believe that just because the girl was black and the guard white, that this whole incident was racially motivated by a racist white guard?

 

[hammy]

Well, the whole "nappy headed," comment doesn't help his cause.

 

[Dangerous]

Now, now, let's not jump to conclusions. The guard was probably in the right, and she probably was nappy headed. I mean we don't even have pictures. I hope she was tazed for her outrageous behavior.

Seconded.

 

[CristoTheSecond]

Isn't it racist to believe that just because the girl was black and the guard white, that this whole incident was racially motivated by a racist white guard?

Well, the whole "nappy headed," comment doesn't help his cause.

Seconded.

 

[Darthphere]

I got to say, that I love how they're pursuing this angle in which the little girl didn't even know nappy head was a racist comment. I mean, does this girl not watch any news for the last 6 months?

 

[bell110]

There is no proof he called her a nappy head.