The Overlord
Superhero
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2002
- Messages
- 8,946
- Reaction score
- 241
- Points
- 73
In fairness, the only villains Miller invented were the Hand (and Kirigi). He reinvented Kingpin for Daredevil and relied heavily on Bullseye. Ann Nocenti invented three noteworthy villains, imo (Typhoid Mary, Bushwhacker, and Bullet) with several others who were adequate to show up again but nothing special (Ammo, the Wildboys, Shotgun). In the scene where Daredevil nearly dies (which is an awesome scene, btw), it's clear that Nocenti is going from the strongest threat (Bushwhacker) to the weakest (the Wildboys), but Daredevil is so beat up he can't stand up to them.
None but Typhoid Mary were used effectively since, but I don't think that's fair to the original characters. Bendis used most villains terribly. I almost think it was a point of pride for him. Shotgun was the worst offender of the bunch, imo. I didn't even recognize that he was supposed to be the same guy.
Miller did make Elektra as well, who can be a villain sometimes.
I would argue that Bushwacker had been used well after Nocenti, there was a DD annual in 1994, where Bushwacker was hired by a drug lord to kill Ben Urich, decided to let Urich live so he can his story on the drug lord and then killed the drug lord when he bribed his way out of his prison, just to prove to Urich that the system doesn't work. He just hasn't been used real well since the 90s.
To me that is the best Bushwacker story, because it is about what makes him tick, rather then being in the story as someone for DD to fight and that's it. To me religious fanatic Bushwacker is better then him having the exact same personality as Bullseye, it makes him more unique.
https://scans-daily.dreamwidth.org/2390533.html
I agree with about bullet though, interesting concept with very little real follow through, so he comes off as generic when he doesn't have to.
I also agree about Bendis and villains in general, besides Purple Man, most B-list villains seem weaker and dumber under his pen, Mr. Hyde had one his worst showings under Bendis (though that's par for the course with Hyde, he goes from dangerous to a joke depending entirely on who is writing him.)
I do think the Wildboys could be interesting, but you would almost have to recreate them from the ground up to make them the work the I suggested and I suppose some writer might find it easier to just create a new street gang to fill the role I suggested. As they stand now, there is no real reason to use them again.
I think some better writing and focus many of the Nocenti vilains, besides Mary, can be good reoccurring villains. I think DD's rogues gallery needs a top to bottom shake up, still use the Miller era villains, but don't have them hog all the spotlight and use a combination of the stronger Silver Age villains, the Nocneti villains and some new villains (Ikari is likely the best new DD villain seen in decades and Soule seems to want to bring in some new villains as well.)
Some of the Silver Age villains have used well within the last decade, Owl has gotten a lot of stories, he kinda has a hit or miss record as a villain. Brubkaer used Mr. Fear well in 2008 and the story really needs a follow up. Purple Man has been a dangerous foe for various heroes for over a decade.