He probably means "42 minutes with 16 minutes of credits"
After everything is said and done, they (or someone) should remove the fat and squeeze everything into one big 2+ hour movie.
The 1st four episodes felt like the 1st hour of a movie. The series has been incredibly slow for a 6 episode mini-series. While the 5th episode felt like that part of the movie before the big fight/climaX.After everything is said and done, they (or someone) should remove the fat and squeeze everything into one big 2+ hour movie.
The 1st four episodes felt like the 1st hour of a movie. The series has been incredibly slow for a 6 episode mini-series. While the 5th episode felt like that part of the movie before the big fight/climaX.
I just don't see how Marvel Studios couldn't have trimmed this to a full length film and needed to be a "series" - especially when other mcu films have dealt with bigger things and bigger amount of characters.
Imo, WandaVision, Hawkeye, Falcon and the Winter Soldier and Loki could have been a 2hour feature film. But I guess its wiser for Disney+ to have the project be split into 5 to 9 weeks, in order for these original programming to have more buzz/chatter, and to entice the subscribers to keep their subscription more.Yep, Falcon and Winter Soldier also had a similar "film structure", with a few big action set pieces early on, and then a big one at the end. I'd argue that could've been a good movie, whereas Hawkeye as a movie would still feel vastly inferior I think, no matter how good the third episode was.
Imo, WandaVision, Hawkeye, Falcon and the Winter Soldier and Loki could have been a 2hour feature film. But I guess its wiser for Disney+ to have the project be split into 5 to 9 weeks, in order for these original programming to have more buzz/chatter, and to entice the subscribers to keep their subscription more.
But story wise, I just have seen anything yet aside from what If that must be a mini-series or a series that is longer than the standard mcu movie.
Eh. What was so important about the sitcom episodes? There were a couple of filler scenes. The first few episodes were mostly teasing and setting up future episodes. Vision despite being in the title wasn't even that well developed. The sitcom homage could have easily been trimmed to 20 to 30 minutes. Ralph is useless in hindsight.I couldn't disagree more about Wandavision. I didn't love the first two episodes but after that there wasn't a moment wasted. If anything, many episodes felt too short.
Eh. What was so important about the sitcom episodes? There were a couple of filler scenes. The first few episodes were mostly teasing and setting up future episodes. Vision despite being in the title wasn't even that well developed. The sitcom homage could have easily been trimmed to 20 to 30 minutes. Ralph is useless in hindsight.
Yep, Falcon and Winter Soldier also had a similar "film structure", with a few big action set pieces early on, and then a big one at the end. I'd argue that could've been a good movie, whereas Hawkeye as a movie would still feel vastly inferior I think, no matter how good the third episode was.
And its story could easily be told in a 2 hour film.The sitcom format was the very essence of the show and why Kevin Feige wanted to make WandaVision. Without that, there would be no WandaVision at all. It wasn't simply to tell this mystery story or further the MCU but was Feige's own personal pet project and love letter to sitcoms and TV nostalgia.
It ain't Lost / Twin Peaks mystery type of show. I don't see how this more or less 4 hour/30 mini series would lost so much, if it lost half its screentime. Unless you really want to dedicate 25 to 30 minutes to every decade of sitcom (from the 50s to late 00s).WandaVision's approach was perfect for episodic television, that's the only one that could not have worked as a feature film. The mystery week-to-week is what made it work.
Sitcoms aired on TV. The whole point of the show is to mimic a tv series. The show simply wouldn't work as a film. Could they tell the same story in a different way to fit a feature film? Sure. But this version of WandaVision belongs on tv.It ain't Lost / Twin Peaks mystery type of show. I don't see how this more or less 4 hour/30 mini series would lost so much, if it lost half its screentime. Unless you really want to dedicate 25 to 30 minutes to every decade of sitcom (from the 50s to late 00s).
It ain't Lost / Twin Peaks mystery type of show. I don't see how this more or less 4 hour/30 mini series would lost so much, if it lost half its screentime. Unless you really want to dedicate 25 to 30 minutes to every decade of sitcom (from the 50s to late 00s).
If Marvel Studios managed to feature all that Infinity Stone hunting in Infinity War then all that Time Travel adventures in Endgame - the plot of WandaVision isn't that impossible to trim under 3 hours.The sitcom elements of WandaVision aren't superfluous. That's why you've got it back to front in your understanding of it. It's not some MCU mystery/action show with sitcom elements pigeon-holed in. It's an MCU sitcom FIRST with mystery elements added. The weekly episodic sitcom format is the main thing.
Sex in the City was a weekly comedy series which was then made into a big screen adaptation. It didn't work as successfully as a 2-hour movie precisely because it lost its episodic aspect.
Totally agree. I can see a bunch of them struggling to get mostly positive reviews if they were made into films.I also believe that these shows, if there were released as "movies", would be under a much closer/bigger scrutiny. But because they are "tv shows" they get a few passes that otherwise would be bigger criticisms on a feature.