Vic Von Doom
Civilian
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2004
- Messages
- 239
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 11
I'm not sure if this technically belongs in the 52 thread since it's the backup story but whatever. I'm gonna go with it.
I was never really that fond of the series to begin with, it was marginally interesting to see the current continuity of New Earth, but I felt it was hindered by the four page format it's being presented in. Anyway, I have officially since become disgusted by it. There were at least three continuity errors or lapses in judgement in the last two issues and there might have been more previously that I missed.
1 A minor one in 52 #8. It mentions that Stephanie Brown was tortured and killed by Black Mask. Technically true. But it's also true that she might be alive today had Leslie Tompkins helped her like doctors are supposed to and not let her die to teach Batman a lesson about putting kids in danger. Maybe DC wants to forget they ever let such a gross error in uncharacteristic behavior happen. Fine, just don't ever mention it again.
2 In 52#9, the round computer thing mentions that Ralph Dibny went on patrol the day Sue died even though it was his birthday. Except it wasn't his birthday, it wasn't for months. Sue thought that by doing the mystery thing early she'd catch him off guard.
3 This one bothered me most. Round computer thing tells Donna that the death of Sue caused Batman to remember about his mindwiping, causing him to create Brother Eye. Wha...? What was the timeframe in between the end of Identity Crisis and the release of Countdown, our time? Two months? Three? What is that, a week in their time? Assuming Batman actually did devote his time during IC trying to find Sue's killer and not building a super-advanced worldwide satellite system that spies on everyone on Earth. And if he did...how long was it in his control before Max Lord swiped it? An hour?
I realize that I sound like a total nerd nitpicking. But it's not like these stories are twenty, thirty years old and he had to dig through the archives. These are barely two years old, Jurgens and the 52 editorial staff can't be bothered to open a copy of IC #1? I'm sure there's one lying around there somewhere. I'm being nerdy on a Simpsons Comic Book Guy scale, but if you're going to put this in a book that's being marketed as one of DC's flagship books for the next year, a chronicle of the DCU recent history can at least get the details right.
I was never really that fond of the series to begin with, it was marginally interesting to see the current continuity of New Earth, but I felt it was hindered by the four page format it's being presented in. Anyway, I have officially since become disgusted by it. There were at least three continuity errors or lapses in judgement in the last two issues and there might have been more previously that I missed.
1 A minor one in 52 #8. It mentions that Stephanie Brown was tortured and killed by Black Mask. Technically true. But it's also true that she might be alive today had Leslie Tompkins helped her like doctors are supposed to and not let her die to teach Batman a lesson about putting kids in danger. Maybe DC wants to forget they ever let such a gross error in uncharacteristic behavior happen. Fine, just don't ever mention it again.
2 In 52#9, the round computer thing mentions that Ralph Dibny went on patrol the day Sue died even though it was his birthday. Except it wasn't his birthday, it wasn't for months. Sue thought that by doing the mystery thing early she'd catch him off guard.
3 This one bothered me most. Round computer thing tells Donna that the death of Sue caused Batman to remember about his mindwiping, causing him to create Brother Eye. Wha...? What was the timeframe in between the end of Identity Crisis and the release of Countdown, our time? Two months? Three? What is that, a week in their time? Assuming Batman actually did devote his time during IC trying to find Sue's killer and not building a super-advanced worldwide satellite system that spies on everyone on Earth. And if he did...how long was it in his control before Max Lord swiped it? An hour?
I realize that I sound like a total nerd nitpicking. But it's not like these stories are twenty, thirty years old and he had to dig through the archives. These are barely two years old, Jurgens and the 52 editorial staff can't be bothered to open a copy of IC #1? I'm sure there's one lying around there somewhere. I'm being nerdy on a Simpsons Comic Book Guy scale, but if you're going to put this in a book that's being marketed as one of DC's flagship books for the next year, a chronicle of the DCU recent history can at least get the details right.