nosebleed.
Superhero
- Joined
- May 4, 2004
- Messages
- 9,792
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 56
The Guard said:Actually, we do. You assuming they haven't been faithful at all to the mythology because you haven't read the script or discovered the story is pretty much your fault.
Please excuse me for not reading the script. I'd like to have some sense of surprise when the movie comes out. And as I have stated many times before...I have concerns about a couple of the designs...not the story. Thanks for chastising me on not spoiling myself though.
You won't read the script, but you will make assumptions about what is/isn't in it without doing so? The story is this: Transformers, giant robot beings from a war-torn world who can transform, come to Earth, meet human beings, ally with humans to stop evil Decepticons and prevent them from taking control of Energon. Does that sound like the basic concept of Transformers to you? Because it sure as hell does to me.
If you are willing to accept completely different looking characters while still adhering to what you typed above then good on you. I'm unhappy with the designs...that's my opinion. I never said Bay isn't sticking to the basic concept...but that doesn't mean its going to feel like a Transformers movie. It may redefine Transformers for a new generation but it could also alienate a couple of generations worth of people who already have a "basic concept" of what they feel Transformers to be.
Yes, in the cartoon. This is a movie. It is less faithful to the LETTER of the mythos, but not to the story mechanics of it. Transformers still come to Earth from Cybertron and space.
I agree. But what is the sole reason for changing so much?
[/quote]No, I mean Energon, cube or otherwise. Energon is in the story, and energon is fairly important part of the Transformers mythology. According to every source I can find (and the show), Energon was involved in G1 and several other generations to boot. [/quote]
Energon in the context of "food" or Energon renamed from Matrix of Leadership?
It's not remotely similar. Many people other than Bush said there would be WMD's. Don Murphy was stating personal opinions and wants, not a government backed lie.
Sorry for the digression, back the subject. DM's personal opinions and wants represent the production of the movie when he voices it in a public forum.
He didn't assure anyone of it, though. He said "We're working on it". Which assures you that they're working on it, and that it's a concern, not that it will happen. "I want him to be a bug" is not "He WILL be a bug".
Its all wordplay...he said she said. He knew that he was the sole voice for Transformers at the time. Nobody else was talking to the fans, the other producers, writers, or director (not selected at the time). If he didn't want his concerns heard as what's happening in production at the time then he should have hired a PR agent.
A cautiously optimistic statement about working on a car company to get the licensing neccessary for Bumblebee to be a bug seems black and white to you?
If they were able to successfully procure permission to use a VW bug then he would have taken complete credit. So why can't he take the blame for saying, "Bumblebee HAS to be a bug"?
Except that he didn't assure it. He essentially said "If we have our way, this is what will happen".
Except that's not what he said.
Wow, what profound insight. Just like calling the character in BATMAN BEGINS "Ra's Al Ghul" doesn't make him exactly like his comic counterpart, calling Optimus Prime "Optimus Prime" doesn't make him EXACTLY like his comic and show counterparts. But that's not the point.
You're example is a poor one because Ra's Al Ghul looked like himself for the most part...in a realistic tone. Megatron looks nothing like any incarnation that came before this movie. This is from a design perspective...which is where my complaint stems from. Not his characterization...which I don't know because its my fault that I don't want to read the script. Boo on me.
The point is, the characters have elements from their comic and show counterparts that make them pretty damn recognizable as those characters. Optimus Prime is the instantly recognizable leader. Ratchet is the medical officer. Bumblebee is the loyal, somewhat human robot making alliances with humans, and even making friends. Ironhide is the military/right hand man type. Megatron is the evil Decepticon ruler who sneers at all that is decent. Starscream is his somewhat two-faced right hand man.
Once again, let me point out my complaints...Megatron does not look like any incarnation whatsoever. Starscream's only point of resemblence is the jet parts. Other than that they look like completely different characters.
Go ask Don Murphy what he meant. That will pretty much end the speculation.
I really don't feel like getting a half assed flamebaited answer, so I think I'll pass.
All it takes is a little common sense to figure out what he meant. Had I been around here back then, I'd have cautioned you all not to assume he meant to expect a literal translation of the show and the comics, as I did with Chris Nolan's BATMAN BEGINS when Nolan and Goyer starting talking about faithfulness, which, surprise surprise, turned out to be not a literal translation of the comics and the mythos. Or really even that close beyond the basics, which TRANSFORMERS seems to have nailed.
We will see, but as far as the designs for Megatron and Starscream are concerned I don't feel that your statement is true.
A spin tactic, as you put it, is often nothing more than the simple truth that some disgruntled fanboy chooses to whine about because he's not getting what he wants. You're mad because he won't admit to lying, when it's entirely possible he didn't begin to mislead you.
So according to you studios don't use spin tactics to make the unfavorable seem favorable? That is naive thinking.
That's nice. Too bad he never said that.
He didn't say most of the things that you say he meant either...the door swings both ways.
