metaphysician
Not a Side-Kick
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2012
- Messages
- 16,124
- Reaction score
- 5,045
- Points
- 103
Tom Holland 57 -1
Michael Keaton 41 +1
Michael Keaton 41 +1
You people are crazy voting for a character you haven't even seen yet. How did Vulture even get to the final two.
??? We have seen him, we've seen him in both trailers. At least 13 seconds of him. Plus Keaton's in the role so you know he's going to kill it.Of course you would. Vote for a characterization you haven't even seen.
That's our harry.
I never said I had him all figured out, I said he looks better than Spidey's characterization (who I have not liked so far) so I'm voting for Vulture. Why is that facepalm worthy? Keaton's a phenomenal actor. Why do you think we're voting for him?Oh lord, you think you have the characterization all figured out because you saw 13 seconds of him.
I'll give you this, harry, your constant ability to make people facepalm is impressive.
Condescending much? Yes, it's better than Spidey because i've seen 10 minutes of him. What do you propose I do, not vote because I haven't seen Vulture in the movie yet? Does that go for everybody currently voting for him or just me?13 seconds of scant vague footage is better than Spidey's characterization, when you barely know a thing about Vulture's characterization, and you seriously ask why that is facepalm worthy?
Congrats, you just elicited another facepalm. Told you that you had a knack for it.
Condescending much? Yes, it's better than Spidey because i've seen 10 minutes of him. What do you propose I do, not vote because I haven't seen Vulture in the movie yet? Does that go for everybody currently voting for him or just me?![]()
Condescending much? Yes, it's better than Spidey because i've seen 10 minutes of him. What do you propose I do, not vote because I haven't seen Vulture in the movie yet? Does that go for everybody currently voting for him or just me?
Also keep in mind people voted for Holland's Spider-Man based off 5-10 minutes of screen time in a movie that wasn't even his -- let alone a main focal point like Vulture will be.
Double standards everywhere.![]()
Didn't know my posts were overwhelming your cerebral cortex.No, just laying out harsh truths. If I wanted to be condescending I'd say something like reading your posts is killing my brain cells.
Except I already said part of the reason I'm voting for Vulture is because of Keaton. And I don't like his character, is it really that much of a stretch to say I prefer a character who looks 5x better than him?Saying 13 seconds of footage is a better characterization is silly, and shouldn't be taken seriously. You vote for what you like. I am not proposing you do anything. I questioned why a handful of people were voting Vulture, and the ones who said they love Keaton as an actor I can at least understand that. But you saying you'd vote regardless because 13 seconds of footage was superior to Spidey's, that was![]()
Well, yeah I guess, I love Keaton in everything I've seen him in.That's what is called blind bias.
Quality being the little we've seen of Adrian Toomes.No, it's not. 10 minutes of screen time is substantial enough time to give people a good flavor of the character. Quality over quantity.
Didn't know my posts were overwhelming your cerebral cortex.
Except I already said part of the reason I'm voting for Vulture is because of Keaton. And I don't like his character, is it really that much of a stretch to say I prefer a character who looks 5x better than him?
Well, yeah I guess, I love Keaton in everything I've seen him in.
Quality being the little we've seen of Adrian Toomes.