Great review Dread!
i just hate thinking how much more satisfying thor vs hulk woudl have been if they had a real proper toe to toe through down
in defence of the scene, it woudl appear that hulk broke one of thor's arms fairly quickly after loki lost control of him and caused it to be one sided.
still though...
a slow wearing down of thor woudl have been a far more acceptable demise than that ownage
Dread, I don't think that's fair because Next Avengers did sell well, and it's a gateway movie for the kids.
Not to mention Dread, Next Avengers featured an excellent and faithful MU version of Ultron.
I don't see the point of the dig. There's not really a limit to this stuff. Next Avengers was something different and so was Hulk VS. It's OK to have both and Marvel SHOULD be doing both. This was a big release so it makes sense its sold well.
Also WOLVERINE.
Think about it guys. What's the one thing every Marvel/Lionsgate animated release so far didn't have? WOLVERINE.
It's not a coincidence.
Solution? Put Wolverine in every next one you are planning.
X-men VS. Avengers? Put Wolverine on both teams.
In fact, make it Wolverine VS.
Next Marvel/Lionsgate release Wolverine VS.
Wolverine and the X-men vs. The Avengers put together with Wolverine and the X-men vs. Alpha Flight.
Printed money.
...I like Wolverine.![]()
Yeah, Thor got his ass handed to him way too easily.
I wasn't real crazy about Matt Wolf's voice work as Thor. He just didn't come across with a lot of power. David Boat from the Ultimate Avenger features had more force to his voice. The other actors were good, Steve Blum was an excellent Wolverine.
The animation didn't impress me much. For all the brutality, the characters look like they were drawn by 6-year olds, which for me lessens the impact.
Overall, my feelings are a bit mixed towards this one. It's definitely better than that kiddie Avengers flick, but I wouldn't call it a ground-breaking masterpiece.
Ah. Well I get kinda sad about it because a lot, especially hardcore Cyclops fans, would say it as an insult. I agree that the guy's a tad overdone, but it's becase he's an interesting character. I liked him for the violence and grunting and general badassitude when I was younger, and now I stll like that but find his whole story and the nuances of his character (dependent on who's writing, some just make him that 2-dimensional snarling *******) to be very intriguing. It's why he's my favorite Marvel character. With Wadey as a close second. Your avys and sigs with him always make me smileSo do I man, why so sad?I didn't mean it as a dig to anyone, just saying that kids these days LOVE violence.
What would you tweak? I thought it's been good to great in the case of Hulk vs. Really liked the anime-ish qualities of the Wolverine segment.Agreed. I did enjoy the movies, but Marvel has a few things to tweak for the future like the animation style.
^Yeah, they'd probably favor the X-Men even though none of them would really stand a chance against Thor alone(except maybe Dark Phoenix), to speak nothing of the rest of the team coming along w/ him.
Thor got owned way too easily.
I have often mentioned how cool Ultron was in NEXT AVENGERS, just a shame the heroes didn't match up. The moral of that story was also completely screwed up.
"Take on the legacy of your dead parents and have the heart to not give up and take on the menace that ended them...unless you can trick the Hulk into fighting that fight for you without you having to do more than fight minions for 15 minutes. Then do that and screw legacy. Hulk sells."
Also, I would bet serious money that not more than 25% of the buyers/watchers of NEXT AVENGERS were children, and out of that figure barely half of that 25% will ever touch a comic in their lives. Bank on it.
That is also true; as big name as Thor, Iron Man, or Hulk are, Wolverine is also big too. Kyle mentioned X-MEN VS. AVENGERS in the Comic-Con interview (that was included in the 2-disc special or Blue-Ray) and I would certainly love to see that. Thor would be a chump and the X-Men would probably win, because Kyle & Yost have more experience with those characters. Despite that, though, it would be an incredible DTV and if handled with the skill as this one was, it would be worth the buy. I hope Marvel & LG are smart enough to make it happen.
Not X-men vs. Avengers. Wolverine and The X-men vs. The Avengers.
Hulk VS. Wolverine = 180K copies sold.
Nitpick. Reading way too much into it.
Nope. You have no proof to back this up. Show me some official research figures.
Wolverine vs. Avengers would sell even more I think. Or even trying Millar's Wolverine vs. the MU story.
An adaption of Ultimate War would be bad-ass. Even though I don't agree with Collossus beating Iron Man in a fight.
Dread, I don't think that's fair because Next Avengers did sell well, and it's a gateway movie for the kids.
Not to mention Dread, Next Avengers featured an excellent and faithful MU version of Ultron.
I don't see the point of the dig. There's not really a limit to this stuff. Next Avengers was something different and so was Hulk VS. It's OK to have both and Marvel SHOULD be doing both.
Yea the kids love Wolverine with all the slashing and the screaming and the gloybben.
Thanks!
I do agree the Hulk vs. Thor fight could have been paced so it wasn't so one sided. It showed the production crew was probably more familiar with Wolverine than Thor.
http://www.the-numbers.com/dvd/charts/weekly/thisweek.php
Sales figures are in. HULK VS. was #7 on the Top 10 DVD sellers list for it's debut week. It sold almost 179,000 units and netted over $3 million in sales. This of course doesn't include rentals, OnDemand numbers, legal downloads, or HD numbers.