- Joined
- Aug 17, 2003
- Messages
- 72,336
- Reaction score
- 43,019
- Points
- 203
Wow, this thread exploded in my absence, LOL!
I'll leave the arguing for others, but I do appreciate Matt, Erz, and Cmill backing me up and trying to stop this character assassination Marx and Powder are attempting on me
As far as who is best of the rest, I am taking both myself and Kal out of this for now, and even if Kal wins, I'll let others discuss my place in the game. I'm not an arrogant person who is going to proclaim himself an all-time great. That is up to people who paved the way before me and who are actively playing. In my experience playing, I'd say Powder is among the "best of the rest." He has his flaws, and is a bit of a hypocrit on this, but he has a ton of strengths. I never played with the likes of Hunter, so I can't comment. I do see some potential Survivor greats in the new crop of the last few games, and there are two players I'd like to comment on:
NYS - I think you're biggest problem this game was lack of dedication. You've shown in my game and Hunter's that you're very clever. I really feel if you were 100% dedicated, you could win. You showed that by making top 4 in my game.
TEDDY - You're an early vote out a lot, but seriously, if you played a bit more strategy, you'd win easy. You seem to be waiting for Godot at times, and I think it's your only real weakness. You are great at being under the radar, but you are too under the radar to win. You have a lot of challenge skill you use at times, and you show you know how the game is played. If you connected yourself a bit better, I really feel you'd win a game. I mean, you're TEDDY. If you ever made finals, I don't see how you could lose. Everyone would love voting for you. Use that!
This is ultimately for the jury to decide, and I don't disrespect your strategy at all. But, I of course side with my strategy, lol
But if you win man, I won't be mad at all. You're a great player and most definitely deserve to win a game, whether it be this game or another should I end up winning, so don't take disrespect for what other people are saying in defense of me. I think some people are just tired of seeing people try and assassinate my character more than they are trying to disrespect you. I'm glad to have people willing to defend me right now, lol!
I'll leave the arguing for others, but I do appreciate Matt, Erz, and Cmill backing me up and trying to stop this character assassination Marx and Powder are attempting on me

As far as who is best of the rest, I am taking both myself and Kal out of this for now, and even if Kal wins, I'll let others discuss my place in the game. I'm not an arrogant person who is going to proclaim himself an all-time great. That is up to people who paved the way before me and who are actively playing. In my experience playing, I'd say Powder is among the "best of the rest." He has his flaws, and is a bit of a hypocrit on this, but he has a ton of strengths. I never played with the likes of Hunter, so I can't comment. I do see some potential Survivor greats in the new crop of the last few games, and there are two players I'd like to comment on:
NYS - I think you're biggest problem this game was lack of dedication. You've shown in my game and Hunter's that you're very clever. I really feel if you were 100% dedicated, you could win. You showed that by making top 4 in my game.
TEDDY - You're an early vote out a lot, but seriously, if you played a bit more strategy, you'd win easy. You seem to be waiting for Godot at times, and I think it's your only real weakness. You are great at being under the radar, but you are too under the radar to win. You have a lot of challenge skill you use at times, and you show you know how the game is played. If you connected yourself a bit better, I really feel you'd win a game. I mean, you're TEDDY. If you ever made finals, I don't see how you could lose. Everyone would love voting for you. Use that!
I think the issue for some is that they think this game is all about manipulation and backstabbing. My question to you is, why does it have to be? Above all else, this is a game about strategy. SF and I had two different strategies in this game. Just because mine was unconventional, shouldn't automatically make his better than mine. He practiced a tied and true startegy, that many have used in the past. I didn't choose to do that. Just because I have less blood on my hands, should not indicate that I played a lesser game or was "Under the Radar". I played to my strengths and worked very hard to stick to my principals. That was my strategy and that is what got me here.
This is ultimately for the jury to decide, and I don't disrespect your strategy at all. But, I of course side with my strategy, lol

But if you win man, I won't be mad at all. You're a great player and most definitely deserve to win a game, whether it be this game or another should I end up winning, so don't take disrespect for what other people are saying in defense of me. I think some people are just tired of seeing people try and assassinate my character more than they are trying to disrespect you. I'm glad to have people willing to defend me right now, lol!
Last edited:
This is why Wats is better than all of you. 




