I Ain't Get No Lounge Cuz of Yall...

Status
Not open for further replies.
It was only one book, and the Lord of the Rings is one book split into three parts because no one can reasonably bind a book that thick.

Not true. The reason it was split into three was because at the time paper was really expensive, and if Allen & Unwin had published it as a single book it would've been so expensive that no one would've bought it.
 
Clippy are you sure you didn't read The History of the Hobbit? That was two volumes.
 
Yeah you could be right. I'll deny that if anyone asks though.
 
This blood moon already gave me the powers I needed to conquer all of mankind. I was shot forth from my fragile human shell into the cosmos where I bathed in the moons blood red warmth. I am here now, my children, not as a destroyer, but a bringer of everlasting life. Will you join me? I ask only once.
 
Are you sure The Hobbit didn't have two books?.
The HOBBIT was a single book....but....for the movie, they are incorporating things he wrote in other books that dealt with things that took place at the same time.
 
This blood moon already gave me the powers I needed to conquer all of mankind. I was shot forth from my fragile human shell into the cosmos where I bathed in the moons blood red warmth. I am here now, my children, not as a destroyer, but a bringer of everlasting life. Will you join me? I ask only once.

We're here for you in these confusing times, Nick.
 
You should count yourself lucky that I'm giving my time to such a show.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,296
Messages
22,081,966
Members
45,881
Latest member
lucindaschatz
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"