Age of Ultron If there was a Civil War Movie....

[babykhris]

With The Defenders and more heroes coming from Agents of SHIELD it's possible..

 

[iambranded]

I don't think they will make a Civil War film, and honestly I don't ever wanna see one. Just thought it'd make for an interesting discussion.

I'm with you.....dont wanna see one...makes no sense anyways

 

[Spider-Vader]

Here's a pretty neat fan treatment from the MCU Facebook page:

I'm not too keen on Civil War being made into a movie & I want Steve to be the last man standing against Thanos, but this seems like it would make for a good movie with some tweaking.

 

[MadVillainy]

Lol all of us saying Civil War will never happen and now the word is that Cap 3 will adapt Civil War
http://screenrant.com/captain-america-3-marvel-civil-war-movie/

 

[Loki882]

That's a dumb idea. I cannot see ANY of the current MCU heroes being pro-registration for various reasons, and certainly not this version of Tony.

 

[Broseph44]

That's a dumb idea. I cannot see ANY of the current MCU heroes being pro-registration for various reasons, and certainly not this version of Tony.

They could make it about something else besides registration Ya know.

 

[Donut]

Hmmmmmmmmmm

 

[Shikamaru]

Assuming this is true, I cannot express how incredibly frustrated I am by this decision.

The ONLY way it can work is if it's INO (in name only). Literally in-name-only, to its purest definition.

And really, this is most definitely a case where business trumped creative input. I severely doubt this would have happened had Batman v Superman not come out the same year (and originally the same day).

 

[an_ewok]

That's a dumb idea. I cannot see ANY of the current MCU heroes being pro-registration for various reasons, and certainly not this version of Tony.

This version of Tony won't be the same version of Tony after AoU.

 

[cph9fa]

I severely doubt this would have happened had Batman v Superman not come out the same year (and originally the same day).

Personally, I kinda doubt that. I've been noticing the seeds for a CW story in the MCU for years. I've not been very vocal about it because I didn't see a realistic way for them to fit it in, with RDJ's final film, A3, clearly being about Thanos.

Renegotiating with RDJ and making it a Cap film is great, though. Evans said he wanted to do a film where Cap makes a mistake and has to live up to it, and this might well give him an opportunity to do that.

 

[Robin91939]

Why don't we wait to see how The Avengers: Age Of Ultron changes the landscape of the Marvel Cinematic Universe and the characters within it before we say that a character would not be this or would not be that.

Something dramatic could happen to the point where something that seems like it would be out of character right now, would seem organic and necessary.

Before Captain America: The Winter Soldier the seeds were planted for Steve to be wary of S.H.I.E.L.D but definitely not for Black Widow to go against them. And she did and it was perfectly fine.

-R

 

[Silvermoth]

Heh, looks like I was right all along.

I always said they would be building to civil war and everyone was nuh uh and now look!

You were all made to be ruled

 

[hoy-small-fry]

I'm not sure how I feel about this. On the one hand, it makes sense there would be some sort of registration deal after Ultron causes a mess, but equally I've heard nothing but bad things from comic book people about CW. And doesn't Cap die?!

 

[Ghostcrow13]

I'm not sure how I feel about this. On the one hand, it makes sense there would be some sort of registration deal after Ultron causes a mess, but equally I've heard nothing but bad things from comic book people about CW. And doesn't Cap die?!

He dies right after I don't think it was in the Civil War arc, but the follow up.

But I don't think it does make sense for a registration act, right now there is 6 super powered heroes if you think about it, Cap, Thor, Iron Man, WM, Hulk and Deathlok. Everyone knows who Cap is, Thor doesn't have a secret identity and presumably Banners and Deathloks identities would have been revealed along with the leaked Shield files. And both IM and WM are also known entities.

By Cap 3, you could add Daredevil, Ant-man, the twins probably Jessica Jones and maybe Iron Fist. So are they gonna be fighting for a registration act for 6 people?

 

[hoy-small-fry]

I think it'll be more a regulation act, wherein the government can deploy superheroes rather than let them run amok

 

[Ghostcrow13]

So then Cap would be for that and Stark against?

 

[hoy-small-fry]

The other way around. Cap already rebelled against that in TWS, whereas feeling remorse for the events of AoU, I can see Stark supporting it

 

[Ghostcrow13]

You're suggesting Captain America would reject what is essentially military service for Superheroes, but Tony would be for it?

I'm not so sure, I think Cap would be up for people who want to use their powers for good being regulated by the government. I'm sure Cap thinks the US army is better than militia.

 

[hoy-small-fry]

In the comics maybe, but not in the MCU. And not after the inevitable carnage of AoU

 

[Ghostcrow13]

Yeah I guess if the government goes after the Avengers hard after AoU, and Tony wants to try and redeem himself in the eyes of the public it could make sense. For Cap to be against and Tony for.

I'm not believing the Faraci rumours on who is on Caps side though, I'm sure Rhodey would be with Tony and on the governments side especially.

 

[Huddsy]

The thing about Civil War is that neither is right or wrong -- it's very much a story about living in a grey world, which was started in the TWS storyline. It fits perfectly with what we've gotten from the MCU thus far. It doesn't need to be taken right from the pages of the Civil War mini-event, but it's own iteration for the MCU.

 

[Dark Raven]

Are they going to call it Captain America 3? Or Iron Man V Captain America: Civil War?

Because it seems like it's jumping on the band wagon of Batman V Superman.

As I've said in another thread, maybe the only way it could work is if it's not really about a registration act at all but they are manipulated to fight but then team up in the end.

 

[cherokeesam]

He dies right after I don't think it was in the Civil War arc, but the follow up.

But I don't think it does make sense for a registration act, right now there is 6 super powered heroes if you think about it, Cap, Thor, Iron Man, WM, Hulk and Deathlok. Everyone knows who Cap is, Thor doesn't have a secret identity and presumably Banners and Deathloks identities would have been revealed along with the leaked Shield files. And both IM and WM are also known entities.

By Cap 3, you could add Daredevil, Ant-man, the twins probably Jessica Jones and maybe Iron Fist. So are they gonna be fighting for a registration act for 6 people?

There'll be a LOT more than 6 metas by the time Cap 3: Civil War (let's be honest: that's what it'll be called if these rumors hold up) releases.

And it isn't so much about "registration" of heroes with secret identities, like it was in the comics; instead, it would probably be simplified to be about government control of the emerging super-powered population. As others have pointed out, at the end of AoU, it would be easy to see why Stark would come down on the side of pro-reg then, while Cap would continue to maintain the Avengers' independence as vitally necessary for their success.

Are they going to call it Captain America 3? Or Iron Man V Captain America: Civil War?

Because it seems like it's jumping on the band wagon of Batman V Superman.

As I've said in another thread, maybe the only way it could work is if it's not really about a registration act at all but they are manipulated to fight but then team up in the end.

Even though we, as comic book geeks, know full well that Civil War predates BvS by at least a decade, yeah, there's certainly going to be a general audience perception that "lol IM vs. CA rips off BvS."

 

[Dark Raven]

Is there a way for both parties to come out unscathed in terms of their reputation as far as the general audience is concerned? In the comics, most readers ended up hating IM by the end of Civil War and were calling for his death. In the movie world, IM is the most popular hero for Marvel and the audiences' fan favourite.

I'm assuming in BvS that neither party will end up being hated by the public, especially if they join forces and team up, and since the movie is a precursor to the Justice League. However, in this case, Avengers has already happened and IM v Cap isn't a precursor at all but could bring an end to the Avengers franchise, especially if it all went south and the public didn't buy into it with one of the hero's reputations being in complete shreds as far as they are concerned.

 

[BoredGuy]

It's tough making IM sympathetic in Civil War
but I guess the altered storyline could help to make his position more relatable
the writers have a hell of a task ahead of them to keep Tony looking good by the end