I'm sorry, the history too? As in, it never existed to begin with? I don't think I could get rid of any of those. Necessity is the mother of invention, and war & conflict create a lot of necessities. We wouldn't even have radios if it weren't for World War I....eradicate the existence and history of one of the above, which would you choose?
It'd also prevent a few things from every happening. Cause people wouldn't be able to fall back on "THIS DEITY WANTS YOU TO!" and everyone else just sit there and nod along saying, "that sounds good."Religion would probably take care of a few of the other above options such as war.
Getting rid of money won't get rid of greed. As long as Person-A has more crap than Person-B, people will always feel the need to have more crap to feel better about themselves. Without money, we'd simply use a trade and barter system, not to mention theft would still exist.I took away money to take away some amount of greed. Greed funds a lot of the world's evils.
Getting rid of money won't get rid of greed. As long as Person-A has more crap than Person-B, people will always feel the need to have more crap to feel better about themselves. Without money, we'd simply use a trade and barter system, not to mention theft would still exist.
Out of all those, only "poverty" strikes me as something you could eliminate as well as the history of and still have a functioning world. If you could eliminate poverty in total, what horrible after effect would that cause?
If you eliminate war or poverty you would get rampant overpopulation and the inevitable death of the human race. It would also take much of the rest of the life on the planet with it.
War, yes. But how would eliminating poverty cause rampant overpopulation? It's not as if it everyone living in poverty dies, or doesn't live a long life, or reproduce.