In Reality Could Frankenstein's Creature Exist.

The-Dark-Knight

Superhero
Joined
Mar 26, 2006
Messages
5,597
Reaction score
1
Points
31
If a person (no not me im not planning on doing this) got loads of fresh body bit's stitched them together doing (doing the proper surgery, connecting the vein's) could in theory Frankensteins monster be 'alive'?
Your thoughts?:huh:
 
Maybe someday, not with todays technology.
 
[jormugand] some people say frankenstein was a book [/jormugand]
 
I always thought Frankenstein was actually Jewish.
like "Franken-steen" more than " stein" like Beer Stein.
 
Sure, why not. There are worlds other than these that peeps blatently ignore. They couldn't be stupid enough to ignore such an advance in science as mass reanimation.

---Morzan
 
If a person (no not me im not planning on doing this) got loads of fresh body bit's stitched them together doing (doing the proper surgery, connecting the vein's) could in theory Frankensteins monster be 'alive'?
Your thoughts?:huh:
In reality, if one could do this then there's absolutely no medical or scientific reason that they couldn't simply reanimate a whole, intact corpse (ignoring highly specific and possibly common tissue damage associated with different means of death).
 
that would bring up the "soul" question.. is it required to have one to live?? do we actually have one??


theoreticaly yes... but whos characteristics or thought processes will it have .. the brain donors??? :huh:
 
that would bring up the "soul" question.. is it required to have one to live?? do we actually have one??


theoreticaly yes... but whos characteristics or thought processes will it have .. the brain donors??? :huh:
Uh...yeah. :huh:
 
The body would be there but the soul obviously not.

---Morzan
 
The body would be there but the soul obviously not.

---Morzan
That's based on the assumption that the soul is anything (or something) other than the collective consciousness and/or the electrochemical impulses of the brain of an individual. :huh:

Why would the, "soul," be absent, and if it is, is the being truly living?
 
That's based on the assumption that the soul is anything (or something) other than the collective consciousness and/or the electrochemical impulses of the brain of an individual. :huh:

Why would the, "soul," be absent, and if it is, is the being truly living?

I view the body as a "vessel" operated by the brain's impulses, etc. I view the soul as something within the "vessel" if it makes sense. In my views, a modern day Frankenstein would be a soulless husk akin to Dementor victims from Harry Potter.

---Morzan
 
The Frankenstein story sounds like something kainedamo would try... "BRIDE OF KAINEDAMO"!!!!!! :wow:
 
So true!!

Rosie's head, Roseanne's vocal chords, Ann Coulter's body=Bride of Kaine!@:

---Morzan
 
[jormugand] some people say frankenstein was a book [/jormugand]
Hahaha


I've heard that revivifying dead tissue would most likely be very difficult if it's even possible at all. Perhaps a fat, lazy, workaholic American could find a way since they arrogantly hoard and monopolize the most advanced technologies though Japan and China will probably beat them to it within 2 or 3 years which will be fun watching their bloated American egos being ground into the dirt like filthy Imperialist coffee grounds and fish heads from the stinking gutter where they belong.
 
But if the brain doesn't die, would the soul still be there?
 
I must get round to seeing that at some point. Can't be as bad as spaceballs, can it?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"