Gaelic Football is a sport played in Ireland, that as I say, is not very big anywhere else.
But if you're still concerned there is another article on the BBC yesterday about it, with a video link:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article2358058.ece
Its not about the sport he's in and I'm not concerend about, its that's it dogfighting and its a professional athelete involved in an illegal business. In any country that's pretty newsworthy, right? So why is there not as much hoopla? Probably because they keep things in perspective? Or we dont?
Why? I mean Michael Vick is not involved in this dog fighting ring and I would suspect have no connection. But, it seems to me that from what little I have read they have been investigating the Northern Ireland dog fighting rings for a long time.]
I said
"at least compare it"
The case has opened up a lot of debate and talk about not just Mike Vick but amongst other things the issue of double standards in animal cruelty and race. You would think something like this would be newsworthy on at least ESPN and all the other networks that have a tendancy to absorb similar news stories. I'm suprised they havent and they have ignored as soon as Vick's case was done, when in reality it shows that organisied dogfighting is not just something that is in black neighbourhoods (and therefore not a Hip Hop thing as idiots like Bill O'Reilly and uncle tom ass Jason Whitlock like to make it), you would think people here in the US would speak on it and how its something that goes on and people arent aware its a federal crime. Or at least discuss the difference in penalty between here and Europe ( equal worldwide rights, right PETA? or is it just to get your name in whatever is the big story?).
Correspondently speaking in the UK and Ireland, I know the media loves cover a story that is a big issue in America, especially if it turns into a media circus ( they covered OJ, Barry Bonds and the brawl). So I would have thought they would too talk about why a pro player would risk his career like this. But they kept in perspective.
Well as I say, not as much TV as us. Debates and these pundit style shows come out of the need to make news appealling to a wide audience. It's entertaining to see people shout back and forth at each other. I don't know for sure, but since you're in London...have you seen a British Bill O'Reily or Mcloughlin Group or Tucker Carlson?
As a matter of fact I have, its David Frost on Sunday mornings on the BBC or worse its that ***-rag of a newspaper the Daily Mail and its entire. A publication that appeals to middle age, white middle to upper class in the countryside and up north who vote conservative but still alienate the multiculturalism of Britain (esp. down south in London). Plus they almost laughably racist and homophobic agenda ( typical story: Black boy Stephen Lawrence beaten to death outside Clapham station by white youths. What did HE threaten THEM with and why wasnt he in school?). Thankfully they have Channel 4 and More 4's excellent newsteam and the Gaurdian and The Independent, plus you know most people have common sense.
Yeah, well...we have a lot more channels, a lot more fat, lazy Americans who want to watch that stuff.
"Give the people what they want" I guess.
**** that be a responsible form of media and kill the showbiz style of your narritive if your gonna have an agenda.