DarthSkywalker
Your Most Aggro Pal (he/him)
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2004
- Messages
- 125,138
- Reaction score
- 65,709
- Points
- 203
Yeah, it is no coincidence that the Bond films got better when they weren't sole writers.I'm glad that Logan will be the sole writer for 24, Wade & Purvis overall Bond works has its ups and down but after 5 Bond films, a break is definitely beneficial, anyway given Logan's solid track records I'm interested to see what he can come up himself.
I thought the grave stone read 1969?Regwec has already given you a reply better than I can.
I like your view on the matter. But don't you find it strange that Bond anno 1981, visited the grave of his wice Tracy that died in 1981 and he even had the same M as the other Bonds, from 1973 and up to that year (he's said to be on "vacation" during the time of the film).
Did Bernard Lee-M have two different 007 at the same during 1969, both of them married a woman called Tracy, and both wives were killed??
Yes, it is very strange. That is my point. That is why it doesn't really work. Same character, different interpretation is really the only thing that makes sense.
The lack of continuity in and of itself makes it pointless really. They can drop something and pick it up when ever they want. They showed this with Skyfall, when we know when Craig's Bond's continuity started.You are, but while you have invented a way of explaining them to yourself to render each of the actors' movies viable within their own mini-series, I don't think the inconsistencies need to explained, since they are inevitable in a series that has run so long.
It believe took them 12 years to touch on Tracy again. Why? Because they thought it'd be a cool PTS.