James Cameron's Sequel to "AVATAR"

Status
Not open for further replies.
Artistic Break, Fartistic Break! I want the sequels by tomorrow ASAP! :oldrazz:
 
So the sequel is basically going to be the end of Avatar throughout? I don't think that is going to fly. People will be expecting a lot more story this time around.

And I'm sure they'll get a lot more story. The term"war movie" doesn mean a film with all action and no plot.

I'm willing to bet my mortgage that Jack and Neytiri's relationship is strained somehow, and that the humans see the potential of the Avatar program and take advantage of it for their own means. (Yes, that's right. Bad guy avatars. Mark my words.)
 
And I'm sure they'll get a lot more story. The term"war movie" doesn mean a film with all action and no plot.

I'm willing to bet my mortgage that Jack and Neytiri's relationship is strained somehow, and that the humans see the potential of the Avatar program and take advantage of it for their own means. (Yes, that's right. Bad guy avatars. Mark my words.)
so a 90% chance that the title is Avatar's.

because Camerons movie title need to start with a T or A. :cwink:
 
Terminator meets Avatar... humans come back in full force and wipe out most of the Navi. Navi discover a way to open some worm holes, have Worthington/Nyteri's naked kid return to the past (but weren't the Navi naked to begin with, I forgot already?). Clone the human Steven Lang and reprogram his mind with that tree/synapse **** to protect the kid. Let the good Steven Lang try to supplant the bad Steven Lang... Lang vs Lang. Only have the bad Steven Lang control an Avatar of his own this time around. Epicness if you ask me.
 
Predator meets Pandora. That's one hell of an ally for mankind to have on their side.
 
god no, but i do like the title to be called AVATARS
 
Avatar only needs $5 million to break Titanic's record and become the number 1 movie of all time. I think with Tuesday's numbers, it will have that title!
 
This has lots of potential. If the last action sequence is any indication, we could get an even more epic scope for the sequel if war is the main theme.

Interesting they mention that, because that is exactly what I was thinking back on Dec. 25 when I said:

"The movie should be 30-60 frames per second (instead of 24) in 3D like James Cameron wants it to be. The eviction of the Energy corp should be a pretext for war as now a full scale invasion and occupation of Pandora is eminent. Meanwhile the 'Sky people' develop a whole army of Avatars to fight for them lead by a new villainous leader who makes his corporate-paid predecessors look like PETA. In keeping with James Cameron flicks, Earth also sends bigger and deadlier Mech's (maybe a wink to Terminator somewhere?) that are fully capable of killing a Na'vi with ease...or maybe even develops a virus to wipe them out.

Meanwhile, Jake and Neytiri and the scientists who remained have to try and help the Na'vi embrace new weaponry, science/technology while keeping the peace with the other Na'vi tribesmen who are on the brink of civil war and want the rest of the humans out. In the sequel also, Jake and Neytiri have to try and negotiate with Earth and maybe Neytiri gets to see Jake's home planet and what the Humans did to it.

Maybe Jake and Sully in a sequel can also do some exploring in Pandora and find more answers about Ay-wa, the connection between Onubtanium and Hometrees or maybe why Humans need Onubtanium so bad, and what role it plays, maybe we could see some sea exploration, and meet new tribes and make new friends (and enemies)."

http://forums.superherohype.com/showthread.php?p=17874621#post17874621

-

War is the only possible outcome of their rebellion. Another aspect I believe Cameron will try to convey is that some people on Earth will be rising up to help them. And in eventuality near the end of this supposed trilogy, humans will finally embrace humanity and look for ways to fix their dying world.
 
Last edited:
i just dont see why they would on Earth agree to send so much weapons on Pandora. i mean those aliens can think and talk. they are not like dogs or worms. the na'vi are intelligent.
 
http://marketsaw.blogspot.com/2010/02/exclusive-want-early-word-on-avatar-2.html
^^^^
The original source for the CinemaBlend article btw.
^

It is interesting that they're saying that the sequel will be made within 4 years. Even if this is true , that still doesn't mean that we'll see it in 4 yrs.
For starters Cameron has always gone overboard with his shoot and budget. So to see the sequel within 4 yrs is the plan.

Secondly again if the 4 year timeframe is the plan , then i can't see Cameron making the dive within that period . Hell if his initial plan was to start pre-production on Battle Angel during the post-prod. of avatar. However Cameron had said that if Post. on Avatar would take more of his time , he would then just focus on avatar. Even a "small" movie like the dive would take 3 yrs to complete with a finished script. Essentially Cameron would have to start shooting ( the mo-cap stuff) the avatar sequel doing post. prod on the dive.
One can already see that that ain't happening.

Cameron would ( at least that is the way i see it) have to focus on the sequel if they wanna release it within 4 years.
 
i think he said that in 2010 he goes again underwater to test some new equipment.
even if he would start he would in 2011. this is not like Favreau or Bay. he wont start on the sequel in 2010.
 
i think he said that in 2010 he goes again underwater to test some new equipment.
even if he would start he would in 2011. this is not like Favreau or Bay. he wont start on the sequel in 2010.


Testing...not shooting a movie. THere is a difference.:cwink:
And yes i don't expect prep for avatar to start in 2010.
Assume that over 4 yrs we'll see the movie. That puts the release date in 2014. It took WETA a little over a year to finish all the VFX. Even with tech. improvements , i can see them still taking a year to finish all the shots for the sequel because they need to render to an entire planet ( or planets :awesome:). So Cameron should be done shooting in 2013.
Combining the live action and mo-cap shoot , that takes about a year right.
So that 2012 which means that Cameron would have to start prep in 2011.
 
Testing...not shooting a movie. THere is a difference.:cwink:
And yes i don't expect prep for avatar to start in 2010.
Assume that over 4 yrs we'll see the movie. That puts the release date in 2014. It took WETA a little over a year to finish all the VFX. Even with tech. improvements , i can see them still taking a year to finish all the shots for the sequel because they need to render to an entire planet ( or planets :awesome:). So Cameron should be done shooting in 2013.
Combining the live action and mo-cap shoot , that takes about a year right.
So that 2012 which means that Cameron would have to start prep in 2011.
a lot of people dont realize that for the sequel they will not render the first movie. for the sequel you need to bring something bigger to the table. you can not expect from people to pay money for the same s.... . yes this was an i-pad joke :oldrazz:
 
god no, but i do like the title to be called AVATARS
Not too keen on that. Works for Alien/Aliens but not quite as cool for "Avatars".
 
TDK showed that you can have a different name and the masses will come.

be smart and make a title that fits with the story. dont force Avatar inside .
 
i just dont see why they would on Earth agree to send so much weapons on Pandora. i mean those aliens can think and talk. they are not like dogs or worms. the na'vi are intelligent.

The humans have spent so much money with the Avatar project and with taking humans to Pandora. They need Unobtanium to preserve Earth's survival so it is pretty much a given that the humans will return to Pandora with more force to take what they believe is theirs.
 
Ugh a romance movie with divers. Here's hoping Avatar 2 has more action than Avatar. I think Lang's character might come back as an Avatar
if he doesn't get cloned.
 
http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=62936
News Corporation chairman and CEO Rupert Murdoch said during his quarterly earnings call on Tuesday that the company, which owns 20th Century Fox, is in early talks with James Cameron about a possible Avatar sequel.

Cameron "has ideas about it," he said, adding: "We will be pushing one." The Hollywood Reporter says Murdoch cautioned analysts not to "hold your breath for another one" in a possible reference to Cameron projects often taking a long time to come to fruition.

News Corporation deputy chairman, president and COO Chase Carey interjected that both sides want to make another movie.

Asked about the Blu-ray and DVD release, Murdoch said Avatar will be released during the company's current fiscal year, which ends June 30. He added that it won't be a 3D release as the technology isn't developed enough yet. A 3D release may be possible "down the road," Carey said.
 
think Lang's character might come back as an Avatar
if he doesn't get cloned.
I don't really want to see him back, at least not in the 1st sequel. Would rather see a new villain, maybe something to do with another alien race.

If Lang makes a secondary villain appearance in the 3rd film I wouldn't complain.
 
If the sequel takes place on another moon then name the sequel the name of that moon & have like a five minute re cap at the beginning of the movie with Jake explaining what has happened in between movies. As no doubt at least 5 to 10 years will pass giving humans time to come back. No harm in seeing Pandora briefly though like the humans return to Pandora but the Na'vi & the Unobtainium are all gone
 
I also don't want humans as the bad guys again. The human aggressors in this film were mercenaries. Would prefer to see human forces ally with Na'vi against a different alien race in the sequel. Would be an awesome combination of future tech military Vs natural.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"