JLA: do you want it or not?

What do you want?

  • YES...Miller's JLA with Cast

  • NO...Drop the project completely

  • Change Director

  • Change cast

  • Clean Slate--still want a JLA movie, just not this one

  • Wait for all solo flicks to finish


Results are only viewable after voting.
I'm a fan of the JLA, but that would be way too many superheroes in one film. They wouldn't be able to focus on all the characters properly. The same thing happened with the X-Men films, thats why a lot of characters where left out of the movies and what makes you think that, that wont happen with this movie, if it ever gets made??
 
7 characters wouldn't be that hard to do, if handled properly of course.
 
From what I've heard this movie sounds all jumbled and dumb, and I also heard they shelved it.

So no I don't want it and it sounds like it's been dumped.
 
Drop it!

If they are gonna have to wait for all solo flicks to finish they'd have to make another reboot of the Batman series, and I believe that wont happen for decades. Then if they had to make a JLA it would be smarter to make solo flcks afterwards.
 
Well to be totally honest we have no clue what wb/dc is planning to do with jla. Same goes for solo films too.
 
I votes the obvious choice....

CLEAN SLATE....Do a JLA film but not this one.....get a new director and cast and write an EPIC script.
 
Yea i hope they do, do a clean slate, and get new crew director and story. It should be treated correctly and it should be a epic film like along the lines of lord of the rings or the narina books/films, or harry potter. I jsut hope we dont have to wait 10-15 yrs for jla to happen. If they dont do jla in the next 1-3 yrs i really hope they will atless get some solo films on the silver screen for gl/flash/ww/ etc......
 
I want a JLA movie, just get a new cast. I really want to see one soon. If we wait till all the heroes get solo films, none of us may be around to see it.
 
With the rate WB/DC is going we are probably never going to see solo films for guys besides batman and superman.
 
I agree. W.B. just doesnt have the courage to try.
 
Yea and that totally stinks they have loads of good characters like ww, gl, flash and some others if treated properly and remain faithful to source material that would make a great movie and probably a killer at the BO if they market it right and it comes out right time in the year and all that.
 
Well you can't really blame them for not trying when batman and superman aren't making them loads of money. I would say its best to wait for one solo flick of each of the lesser characters and after the batman trilogy. Depending on TDK it could be sooner if it does bad and much later if it does good.
 
I'm open to Routh but Miller's cast sux! With the negative buzz this movie would receive you are looking at $200M BO domestically compared to $350M for Avengers cuase the hype for both of these movies are going in 2 different directions. :o
 
I'm not actually surprised at the negative reaction DC fans have toward WB and what should be the king of all superhero films, especially now when they see how Marvel have started doing things in the lead up to Avengers (assuming it gets made).
 
LMAO at people who want solo projects first, Batman Begins and Superman Returns can't even beat "300" and "Iron Man" at the box office, what the f--- can The Flash and Wonder Woman do? :D
 
LMAO at people who want solo projects first, Batman Begins and Superman Returns can't even beat "300" and "Iron Man" at the box office, what the f--- can The Flash and Wonder Woman do? :D

Wasn't 300 a WB project? :huh:
 
I'm open to Routh but Miller's cast sux! With the negative buzz this movie would receive you are looking at $200M BO domestically compared to $350M for Avengers cuase the hype for both of these movies are going in 2 different directions. :o

By the time a film like 'Avengers" gets released (if that becomes the title) expectations will be higher that $350M due to inflation.
 
Wasn't 300 a WB project? :huh:
Yeah, but my point is if worldwide icons (Bats/Supes) can't beat an unknown property like 300, what's the use of spending 150 to 200M on The Flash? It's better to release a 200M dollar movie based on a group that includes an array of heroes that people want to see, including Bats/Supes. Then WB can branch out to individual films (a la X-Men's Wolverine movie) if JLA is successful. I just think JLA has a much better chance at the box office, than The Flash and especially Wonder Woman.


Let JLA lead and individual projects follow.
 
Yea that seems to be what they were really shooting for but then if jla happened and was a bomb at the bo that pretty much kills solo films for ww/flash/gl from ever getting off the ground again for many many years.
 
They need a really good director, writers, and a knockout cast in order for this film to make the kind of $$$ they want.
Sure it will cost them to do that, but you gotta spend it to make it.
Doing it on the cheap is just asking for a bomb.
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,265
Messages
22,075,528
Members
45,874
Latest member
kedenlewis
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"