Judge Orders Bakery to Serve Gay Couple

Oh there's definitely a gay agenda, it's just not a big deal if you agree with it. Legalize homosexuality (believe it or not, that's still an issue in a lot of places), get marriage rights, etc.
 
Then there is also a Christian agenda, conservative agenda, Fox News agenda... The list could just go on and on.

yes, I have no problem giving names to those agendas.,...its weird how gay lobby desperately wants people to think they don't exist at all, like we can't google them or something...:huh: I really have trouble trusting social liberals when they engage in these PC groupthink tactics.
 
people have a problem using the term because it seems has a negative connotation...but it is in fact an agenda...to normalize and promote homosexuality. It's appropriate terminology.

Then many posters have an agenda to promote the eating of cake and pie here on the hype. That's about the same problem with an agenda like that I would expect to have.

People want to love who they love. For a religion that professes total and unconditional love, there seems to be some sort of miscommunication between what is said and what is acted out.
 
people have a problem using the term because it seems has a negative connotation...but it is in fact an agenda...to normalize and promote homosexuality. It's appropriate terminology.

Those pesky civil rights advocates with their agenda for equality!
 
Well I do notice that Americans generally only use the term "scheme" with negative connotations.
 
yes, I have no problem giving names to those agendas.,...its weird how gay lobby desperately wants people to think they don't exist at all, like we can't google them or something...:huh: I really have trouble trusting social liberals when they engage in these PC groupthink tactics.
And a lot of us have trouble trusting social conservatives when they engage in their groupthink tactics.

Works both ways.
 
Then many posters have an agenda to promote the eating of cake and pie here on the hype. That's about the same problem with an agenda like that I would expect to have.

People want to love who they love. For a religion that professes total and unconditional love, there seems to be some sort of miscommunication between what is said and what is acted out.

Love <> sex. Homosexuality is sexual attraction between members of same genders. I cringe at this movement to try blur homosexuality as some sort of "brotherly love". You can love someone without engaging in sexual acts with that person. Don't confuse the two.
 
Well we all better watch out for that hetro agenda. Who knows what insidious plots could be lurking around the corner?
 
yes, I have no problem giving names to those agendas.,...its weird how gay lobby desperately wants people to think they don't exist at all, like we can't google them or something...:huh: I really have trouble trusting social liberals when they engage in these PC groupthink tactics.

My guess is that they try to maintain as low of a profile as possible, or you know, to be treated the same as everyone else.
 
Love <> sex. Homosexuality is sexual attraction between members of same genders. I cringe at this movement to try blur homosexuality as some sort of "brotherly love". You can love someone without engaging in sexual acts with that person. Don't confuse the two.

And heterosexuality doesn't always lead to love either. You can love people with or without physical contact. I find that physical contact only strengthens the bonds. Would you prefer that all homosexuals be segregated away from each other and from everyone else?
 
Love <> sex. Homosexuality is sexual attraction between members of same genders. I cringe at this movement to try blur homosexuality as some sort of "brotherly love". You can love someone without engaging in sexual acts with that person. Don't confuse the two.

It's sad that you clearly don't know what love is...

cue the foreigner song..

[YT]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=raNGeq3_DtM[/YT]
 
You just got that song in my head without even watching that video. You just made the list.
 
Love <> sex. Homosexuality is sexual attraction between members of same genders. I cringe at this movement to try blur homosexuality as some sort of "brotherly love". You can love someone without engaging in sexual acts with that person. Don't confuse the two.
Than heterosexuality has nothing to do with love, either.

Also, by your logic, two people of the same gender can't possibly fall in love with each other. That they are just mistaking their sexual attraction for love. With that, the same would also be true for straight couples.
 
Well it is all just brain chemicals in the end.
 
Prove to me that love exists! BRING ON DA SCIENCE!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"