dont. it really sucks. i cant believe it has a fanbase.
Personally I don't see why the WB is rushing to try and get this movie made. I mean why don't they just do the individual movies first, get em' outta the way. Then see bout trying to get Bale, Routh, and the other actors who might be playing Flash, GL, WW, etc. together. Give them whatever they want money wise, a good script, decent director (only C Nolan for me). Then take it from there.
Anyways I'd like to know what you guys think:
Which JLA movie would make more money?
A Motion Capture/CGI JLA movie or a live-action one with Bale, Routh, and other big name stars?
Technically yes and no. It was debunked that Justice League was an all cgi movie, but they will have cgi in it, basically the OMAC's and a digital Supes and so forth, and for that, mocap would be used.Wasn't this mo-cap rumor debunked like two weeks ago?
Technically yes and no. It was debunked that Justice League was an all cgi movie, but they will have cgi in it, basically the OMAC's and a digital Supes and so forth, and for that, mocap would be used.
I hope not, I would have no interest in an all mocap J.L. film.Yeah, they're using mo-cap for some scenes (Atlantis was another rumored one), but the thing won't be Beowulf.
Ditto. I have ZERO interest in an entirely mo-cap film. None. I want to see living actors on screen - 100% the real deal - unless it's impossible for those beings to exist (ex: Davy Jones or Gollum.) I'm not interested in CGI composites of actors assembled in a computer and articulated like a toy. If you're going to do that, just animate the darn film.I hope not, I would have no interest in an all mocap J.L. film.