Keaton's Best Batman performance?

Discussion in 'Batman World' started by Sabotage8475, May 20, 2006.

  1. Sabotage8475 Registered

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2004
    Messages:
    484
    Likes Received:
    0
    Batman? OR Batman Returns?
     
  2. captain_jimbo I love Star Trek XI

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2005
    Messages:
    1,141
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wow, good question, that's tricky!

    I'd have to say Batman...no, Returns...no, Batman.

    ...s**t!
     
  3. El Payaso Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2005
    Messages:
    15,262
    Likes Received:
    1
  4. captain_jimbo I love Star Trek XI

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2005
    Messages:
    1,141
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yeah f**k it. Both.
     
  5. The Kid AMERICA FTW

    Joined:
    May 28, 2005
    Messages:
    12,766
    Likes Received:
    0
    IN something I read about Returns, he said he felt weird trying to play batman again because he felt like this time he was trying to play himself acting as batman since its a sequel and I guess he had forgotten what he did to make himself act the way he did last time... (or something like that) Anyway, they're both good so its hard to say which was best dammit.

    I loved both... can't see them as that different either so he's just best in both... heh..
     
  6. The Chairman Pimps' Main Prophet

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2005
    Messages:
    18,818
    Likes Received:
    0
  7. Dr. Fate Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2005
    Messages:
    12,741
    Likes Received:
    1
    Weren't they pretty much the same?
     
  8. D'Artagnan Registered

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Messages:
    155
    Likes Received:
    0
    The first one was WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY better. He was focused and he was a badass.

    In Returns, he looks confused much of the time, too much of Keaton's comedy backup comes through.
     
  9. Bat Attack Mirth

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2005
    Messages:
    14,183
    Likes Received:
    1
  10. Whack Arnolds Registered

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2005
    Messages:
    4,912
    Likes Received:
    0
    B89, hands down. In B89, it was just natural, and he was going with the character. In Returns, he is kind of bland and seems to be a shell of his former performance. In B89, he has an edge and an aura. I don't think he has that at ALL in Returns. He's just "there". In B89, he has a mighty presense, but in Returns he doesn't.
     
  11. MaskedManJRK Registered

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Messages:
    9,194
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't know about you, but I think his taking out the Fat Man in Returns was pretty badass. :up:
     
  12. Whack Arnolds Registered

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2005
    Messages:
    4,912
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yeah, he couldn't physically kick his ass....so he killed him.
     
  13. MaskedManJRK Registered

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Messages:
    9,194
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think that was what Keaton was trying to do.

    Looking at the events that happened before in '89 and looking at Returns, I see it as Batman lost in the mess of murder and mayhem that he created when he murdered The Joker and his men to try and stop the pain that comes from his parent's murder by taking out the murderer. This obviously didn't happen, and the pain seemed to be even more intesified.

    It's only near the second half of the movie, when he's considering discarding the Batman persona to be with Selina, handling the final job, where he seems fairly whole again, and that collapses at the end when Selina refuses and sets herself up in the same exact emptyness that he created for himself at the end of the first movie.
     
  14. MaskedManJRK Registered

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Messages:
    9,194
    Likes Received:
    0
    It's the f**ked-up grin that Batman gives the Fat Man that does it for me. Funny and badass at the same time. :)
     
  15. Bat Attack Mirth

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2005
    Messages:
    14,183
    Likes Received:
    1
    I found that grin chilling...eek!
     
  16. The BatDude Dopest Dope

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2005
    Messages:
    3,030
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'll have to go with the 89 movie
     
  17. The Chairman Pimps' Main Prophet

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2005
    Messages:
    18,818
    Likes Received:
    0
    Me too.
     
  18. Van Petrol Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2004
    Messages:
    17,207
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think I'd have to go with B89, though it is very close.
     
  19. batmaluco Run, Batman! Run!

    Joined:
    May 10, 2005
    Messages:
    4,931
    Likes Received:
    0
    He was great in both films.
     
  20. Cain Gentlebane

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2005
    Messages:
    6,174
    Likes Received:
    138
    Agreed
     
  21. James"007"Bond Registered

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2005
    Messages:
    1,694
    Likes Received:
    0
    Both but B89 was an awesome movie and keaton really captured what batman was all about, he scared the s hit out of me......on nother note keaton is the only actor to play batman who actually looks badass and a tad monstrous in the batsuit.
     
  22. SHADOWBAT69 outlaw

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2004
    Messages:
    4,357
    Likes Received:
    0
    you know, this is an interesting topic. I actually had to think about this. I loved him in both movies, i think his performance was brilliant in both. He did play the character a bit differently tho in Returns than in 89. He played a more mysterious Batman than he did in Returns. I love his interaction with both Penguin and Catwoman in Returns, especially his "youre not the mayor" confrontation as well as his attempt to redeem Selina at the end. There hasnt been any hero/villain interaction in any Batman movie that can touch those 2 scenes. He also played Bruce Wayne as a more evolved character because we got to see the business side of him as well as the playboy and brooding man.

    So, i guess ill have to say Returns was the better performance for me.
     
  23. Kevin Roegele Do you mind if I don't?

    Joined:
    May 2, 2000
    Messages:
    23,878
    Likes Received:
    64
    It was, but that just highlights the difference between the two movies. In the first one, he wouldn't have grinned as he smacked the guy into the hole. To me, that's more badass.

    A lot of it down to the direction. In Batman, the character is cloaked in mystery and often hidden in the shadows. He's usually silent, he appears, kicks ass, vanishes. In Returns, Burton doesn't try to make Batman mysterious, so we follow him around, we know everything he does, he makes some one-liners, he talks more, and so on.
     
  24. Catman Registered

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2002
    Messages:
    29,046
    Likes Received:
    1
    Yeah. . .this is an interesting question. The reason is because he was great in both films. Of course the character evolved, so it had to be played differently. In B89 he was motivated by the death of his parents. In Returns since he got his revenge he wasn't sure if he wanted to continue. I guess he felt he could continue contributing to society by just being Bruce Wayne, which explains that whole meeting with Max Schrek where he wants to stop the whole power plant thing.

    But. . .with that being said. . .I liked how in Returns he actually did most of his own stunts. That's what bothers me a bit about B89. One second you have Keaton being a badass and the next you have a stunt guy kicking or punishing someone. Atleast here it's Keaton kicking some ass. I guess he felt he had to do it since Michelle Phieffer was doing most of the stunts. For instance that scene in the rooftop was awesome. That's Keaton and Michelle going at it. How awesome is that? Even though it wasn't the best cherography I liked it a lot more than Daredevil and Electra fighting at the rooftop.
     
  25. Bruce_Wayne29 Registered

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    3,111
    Likes Received:
    0
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    Try and beat that one Val Kilmer...lol Even smiling Keaton is badass !

    He was great in both. His performance in the first one was so special and mysterious but in the second one he seemed to be more confortable in the character.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"