Frontier
Arkham Asylum Inmate
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2008
- Messages
- 523
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 11
I don't remember where or when, but I distinctly recall director/sometimes actor Kevin Smith's primary lament of Superhero films, in spite of how much he enjoys them, being that any other medium outside of the comic itself, denies one of the key critical abilities of said medium to be translated. Which is the characters internalization, I think is how he put it.
That is to say, the 'thought bubbles' that allow us to see and hear (read) the inner thoughts of a given character. Mostly the hero, but also occasionally the villain or other support characters. To know what they feel and why they make decisions as they do, to see their struggle.
So my question is... why doesn't any director ever try to do this in their film?
Movies may not have text 'thought bubbles' but they do occasionally have... voice overs.
Which could adapt to serve the same basic purpose.
I imagine it would be distracting to constantly hear the thoughts of the characters throughout the film, which is why it's likely not been done, but surely they could try it once with a good balance. Perhaps only doing such on a handful of occasions when it really serves a purpose rather than through the whole film.
Some films are actually made better for such. "The Shawshank Redemption" for prime example, was more or less narrated by Morgan Freeman. Without such I imagine the movie wouldn't be as good. (I'm aware it didn't do well at the box-office, but it's become a cult classic since)
That is to say, the 'thought bubbles' that allow us to see and hear (read) the inner thoughts of a given character. Mostly the hero, but also occasionally the villain or other support characters. To know what they feel and why they make decisions as they do, to see their struggle.
So my question is... why doesn't any director ever try to do this in their film?
Movies may not have text 'thought bubbles' but they do occasionally have... voice overs.
Which could adapt to serve the same basic purpose.
I imagine it would be distracting to constantly hear the thoughts of the characters throughout the film, which is why it's likely not been done, but surely they could try it once with a good balance. Perhaps only doing such on a handful of occasions when it really serves a purpose rather than through the whole film.
Some films are actually made better for such. "The Shawshank Redemption" for prime example, was more or less narrated by Morgan Freeman. Without such I imagine the movie wouldn't be as good. (I'm aware it didn't do well at the box-office, but it's become a cult classic since)