I actually thought it was one of his better preformances.
i have yet to understand the dislike for this movie...
I actually thought it was one of his better preformances.
What a complete frivolous waste of time. This film is so utterly superficial. There isn't an ounce of substance to it. It's just a bunch of action scenes edited together.
i have yet to understand the dislike for this movie...
I thought this film was fine. After all, 'action-adventure' is a genre. It's not supposed to be an emotional drama. Tell me where was the emotional depth in any Indiana Jones movie, any of the Lord of the Rings movies - they were just plot-driven adventures.
Haydn was perhaps a bit wooden, but then he was supposed to be this kid who lived an entirely different existence from normal people, so he was supposed to be 'removed' from everyday life and to seem unusual and self-absorbed
Worst thing was Jackson's white hair.
Can't understand the hate for the movie. Have people forgotten how to enjoy themselves?
I actually thought it was one of his better preformances.
You hit the nail on the head. They were plot driven. Meaning that even though they were tied together, each had its own story arc. This movie did not. Its not the lack of emotion that bothered me. It is the lack of a plot.
I don't think he's that bad. I thought he was fine in Awake. I don't understand the hate for him when there are so many actors who are worse. Maybe it's because he was in star wars, why you guys hate him so much?
Not all movies need that mythic quest to find/destroy something as in Indiana (finding a poweful artefact) and LoTR (destroying a powerful artefact).
The plot in Jumper was obviously the Paladins' quest to kill the jumpers. That became the quest. David Rice had no mythic quest, except to survive and then rescue his girlfriend, and i think that worked okay. Prior to all that, it was the origin/set-up stuff that showed him discovering his power and adapting to it.
Although it was open-ended, with too little of the mother to make us care about her, and although Jackson's hair was ridiculous, this was above-average entertainment. The FX were fine, the father seemed totally believable, Jamie Bell was great, Bilson was a stereotypical US girl as though she'd stepped off the set of The OC (but i never expect anything else from girls cast in an American movie).
Overall, it didn't deserve the hate it got.
I thought this film was fine. After all, 'action-adventure' is a genre. It's not supposed to be an emotional drama. Tell me where was the emotional depth in any Indiana Jones movie, any of the Lord of the Rings movies - they were just plot-driven adventures.
Haydn was perhaps a bit wooden, but then he was supposed to be this kid who lived an entirely different existence from normal people, so he was supposed to be 'removed' from everyday life and to seem unusual and self-absorbed
Worst thing was Jackson's white hair.
Can't understand the hate for the movie. Have people forgotten how to enjoy themselves?