• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

Loungers of the Galaxy - - Part 84

Status
Not open for further replies.
Welsh is another difficult and patently insane language.
 
Yep. I think only Mandarin and Farsi are more difficult among mainstream languages.

Mandarin grammar is easy as hell, but it's so difficult to differentiate between the four tones unless you grow up listening to it.

I can still understand most conversational Mandarin, but forget about writing it. :funny:
 
So I just watched The Lone Ranger, not a bad movie at all. I mean its no great cinema, but I wasn't expecting a great piece of cinema. Just a fun/funny movie. It may help I only half watched it.
 
Ugh…. the Politics sub-forum has been great lately. No "truther" nonsense for months…. and then suddenly another narcissistic newb who can't take a hint has to barge in and just taint the punch-bowl again.

Don't say taint. In any language. Farsi, Welsh, Mandarin... You name it. :oldrazz: :word:
 
So I just watched The Lone Ranger, not a bad movie at all. I mean its no great cinema, but I wasn't expecting a great piece of cinema. Just a fun/funny movie. It may help I only half watched it.

I watched the whole thing and I liked it. The lone ranger theme for the climax of the movie was amazing.

Kev, I can't convince people that Superman was not the one responsible for the destruction of Metropolis in MOS. I ain't touching 9/11.

It's not my fault you present poor arguments. :o
 
It's not my fault you present poor arguments. :o


Most of my debate tactics come down to saying "Did not... Nuh-uh!" a lot. It usually works until the other person goes "Did so... Uh-huh!"


By the way that pretty much sums up the level of debate when it comes to MOS.
 
I watched the whole thing and I liked it. The lone ranger theme for the climax of the movie was amazing.
Yea, I noticed that and thought it was awesome. Also, as I pointed out about half an hour or so ago on the Skype call as I watched, Wilkinson kinda looks like Anthony Hopkins in thaat movie. What with the beard and all
 
I just like to argue for the sake of arguing. Sometimes I'll do a 180 and swap sides if one is winning. :D
 
I just like to argue for the sake of arguing. Sometimes I'll do a 180 and swap sides if one is winning. :D

I'd hate to see you in a class debating A MODEST PROPOSAL by Swift. :wow: :word:
 
I've actually had arguments for both sides before on similar topics. I got very weird looks during them.

Mind you I'm not being serious for either side but I do try to see all sides while I'm arguing.
 
I've actually had arguments for both sides before on similar topics. I got very weird looks during them.

Mind you I'm not being serious for either side but I do try to see all sides while I'm arguing.

[YT]CxK_nA2iVXw[/YT]

:word:
 
I just like to argue for the sake of arguing. Sometimes I'll do a 180 and swap sides if one is winning. :D

I like to argue too, but this guy's actually getting me angry. 9/11 trutherism is one of those things that sets me off. I shouldn't let it get to me, but... ugh. :doh:
 
One of the topics I debated once was "Due to overpopulation when should cannibalism be considered acceptable?" I decided I'd go three routes. 1) It's acceptable only when to other food source is available and it is a life or death situation as seen in several situations like those soccer players that crashed on the mountain years back 2) Should overpopulation hit a certain level and food sources do run low it should be acceptable at that time to do so as needed to supplement existing food sources as long as wholesale murder/genocide was not acceptable. 3) It's acceptable at any given time in any situation as long as it's not outright murder.

I was asked to stop before I could hit point 3 but after I explained it. Apparently some people don't like to think about those things too much. :D
 
One of the topics I debated once was "Due to overpopulation when should cannibalism be considered acceptable?" I decided I'd go three routes. 1) It's acceptable only when to other food source is available and it is a life or death situation as seen in several situations like those soccer players that crashed on the mountain years back 2) Should overpopulation hit a certain level and food sources do run low it should be acceptable at that time to do so as needed to supplement existing food sources as long as wholesale murder/genocide was not acceptable. 3) It's acceptable at any given time in any situation as long as it's not outright murder.

I was asked to stop before I could hit point 3 but after I explained it. Apparently some people don't like to think about those things too much. :D

(Note to self: No matter how harmless it may seem never accept Kev's invite to go hiking for a weekend in the Canadian Rockies.)
 
How about coming over for dinner sometime then?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"