Batmannerism
Super-unknown
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2012
- Messages
- 7,096
- Reaction score
- 4,770
- Points
- 103
Yes and no.
Yes because it's an intresting use of the character and Hamill is excellent in his performance. The last shots of his send off are perfect. Yes because it follows the pattern of the Star Wars saga; older Jedi becomes hermit, trains last hope, becomes one with the Force. His arc is a mix of Yoda (refusing to help at first) and Obi-Wan (failing an apprentice, sacrificing himself). There were also the shades of grey that Lucas bought to the Jedi in Revenge of the Sith.
No because it goes against what's been established for Luke. Luke doesn't give up. Luke doesn't consider killing people in their sleep! Luke is a hero through and through, and it's profoundly depressing to see him abandon the galaxy and his own sister. Also he doesn't fight anyone with his lightsaber. How many years have we imagined what Luke would be like as a Jedi master? How awesome in action? Yet we never see it.
Yeah that pretty much sums it up - although I would say the positives outweigh the negatives
For me Luke was the highlight of the film. A lot of the other stuff they could have left out, but Luke they got right.
Still, it would have been awesome to see him as a Jedi master in action (other than his projection trick)