Cap2024
1st-generation immigrant, bisexual, latino, aspie.
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2024
- Messages
- 667
- Reaction score
- 524
- Points
- 28
It didn't. Comparatively to other blockbusters at the time it didn't do huge business, but it got great reviews and lots of awards hype.
But Mad Max, as influential as it is, has never been this huge blockbuster franchise. It's kind of like Blade Runner. Sci-fi classic, seminal, influential. Filmmakers worship it. And yet the sequel bombed.
For clarification in case anyone initially misreads that like I did - the sequel that bombed was Blade Runner’s not Mad Max’s.
Mad Max 2 (by looking at the numbers) was a phenomenal indicator for indie films at the time I’m guessing. 3 million budget, 23 million box office worldwide; films today would wish for that kind of multiplier - that performance, imo, is inspiring. Almost like (could be way off) the Paranormal Activity of its time in terms of budget and box office.
[to put inflation into account - the third film was 12 million budget, thus I’m guessing 3 mil at the time was still really independent]
Last edited: