Man in Suit v CGI-Your thoughts on the Hulk 2:Hulk/Abomination

[Dragon]

He was modeled after Bana's face. Just muscled up and expanded. I think they should even allow Bana to act as the Hulk in close-up, the way they set up for Andy what's-his-name to do Kong's facial expressions.

 

[Odin's Lapdog]

it still never looked like him to me though

 

[Amm-arD]

you guys seen this before?... i was just searching for Hulk pics from the movie and i got this

the last one would have been awesome IMO, i dont know if these were done by someone using photosop or not, but these look good.

nice find! Some may say the proportions are wrong on this one, but i think its the best one! A truly lovely piece of art!

 

[Odin's Lapdog]

it is a nicest pic, but the proportions are still off on it, he looks bigger than the helicopters and considering that he was under half the size of that in the film, it does look off putting.

perhaps they thought of even making him bigger than his largest size on screen.

 

[Sava]

that poster with the Hulk in his right size would have been better than what we got IMO, not that what we got was crap or anything

 

[Odin's Lapdog]

yeah, anyone would any decent manipulation photoshop skills, now is your time to shine...




ps, you can also add some f22 raptors to the background if ya wanted

 

[Dragon]

A couple questions-

First, what do these posters have to do with the subject of the thread?

Second and more important- You guys go on about how the Evil Marketing Department ruined the movie. Yet you guys endorse a poster that is completely aginst what the movie is about.

1. Aside from the Hulk's size being wrong- the proportions are completely different from the CGI Hulk. His head is tiny, his upper body is too big- his ARMS are bigger than his LEGS, and the overall muscularity is wrong.

2. It gives the idea that the film's major battle takes place on the bridge and that wanton destruction (re: "mindless violence") is taking place there.

So- isn't this something that would have misled the audience?????

 

[Sava]

A couple questions-

First, what do these posters have to do with the subject of the thread?

Second and more important- You guys go on about how the Evil Marketing Department ruined the movie. Yet you guys endorse a poster that is completely aginst what the movie is about.

1. Aside from the Hulk's size being wrong- the proportions are completely different from the CGI Hulk. His head is tiny, his upper body is too big- his ARMS are bigger than his LEGS, and the overall muscularity is wrong.

2. It gives the idea that the film's major battle takes place on the bridge and that wanton destruction (re: "mindless violence") is taking place there.

So- isn't this something that would have misled the audience?????

that poster with the correct Hulk from the movie would have been great. I dont think the bridge will say anything other than this takes place in San Fran. The action bit you're right about.

 

[Dragon]

Having seen X-men tonight, the man-in-suit thing can work. Beast and Juggernaut looked fine, and Kelsey Grammer showed how a good actor can get you into the character.

 

[Van Petrol]

They've gone with CGI now, might as well stick with it.

 

[Sava]

Having seen X-men tonight, the man-in-suit thing can work. Beast and Juggernaut looked fine, and Kelsey Grammer showed how a good actor can get you into the character.

i still havent seen it, seeing as how the only Man in suit thing we got so far being F4, i doubt they got the best out of it. How good were Juggy and Beast?

 

[storyteller]

They can do a man in suit as long as its bana for close ups. By scaling the environment down they can do it. I'm saying like of all the hulk scenes. 20-30% be man in suit and the rest be simply cgi. Hulk 1 had near perfect cgi. The only times it screwed up was when they had hulk a flippen 2 story in proportion to somebody(aka betty).

 

[Dragon]

i still havent seen it, seeing as how the only Man in suit thing we got so far being F4, i doubt they got the best out of it. How good were Juggy and Beast?

Juggernaut was written stupidly. But he looked dangerous. Beast was a highlight of the movie. In action he was really cool. Just to pass along the info, the movie wasn't great. Now on the opposite end of the spectrum, the CGI for Iceman totally iced-up looked pretty cool as well (no oun intended).

The X-men films are a pretty good balance for use of make-up and CGI.

 

[Atomicchuck3k]

A body suit transformed Drummer Travis Barker from this:

To this....

 

[Odin's Lapdog]

why was he in a body suit?

 

[Atomicchuck3k]

A huge man with the right body suit making him even bigger would also work.

Here's my pick's for Creature Casting:

Dalip Singh / Abomination

[SIZE=-1]Wrestler: [/SIZE][SIZE=-1]Dalip Singh[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1][/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]Real [/SIZE][SIZE=-1]Name:[/SIZE][SIZE=-1]Dalip Singh[/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]Birthday:[/SIZE][SIZE=-1]August 27, 1972[/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]Hometown:[/SIZE][SIZE=-1]India[/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]Marital Status:[/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]Height & Weight: [/SIZE][SIZE=-1]7'3" - 408 lbs[/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]Trained by:[/SIZE][SIZE=-1]All Pro Wrestling [/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]Debut:[/SIZE][SIZE=-1]October 7, 2000[/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]Previous Gimmicks:[/SIZE][SIZE=-1]Giant Singh (Japan)[/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]Finishing Move:[/SIZE][SIZE=-1]Power Bomb[/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]Favorite Moves:[/SIZE][SIZE=-1]Choke Slam[/SIZE]

Bob Sapp / The Incredible HULK

BOB SAPP

U.S.A. / Team Beast / American Football

COUNTRY : U.S.A.

DATE OF BIRTH : September 22, 1974

HEIGHT : 6 feet 7 inch
WEIGHT : 335 lbs

*TITLES*

37th IWGP Heavyweight Champion '04
K-1 WORLD GP 2005 in HIROSHIMA Champion

*BOUT RESULTS*

K-1 17 Fights 10 Wins 6 Losses 1 Draw 6 KOs
MMA 10 Fights 8 Wins 2 Losses
Wrestling 10 Fights 8 Wins

Put these 2 guys in Body Suits to make them wider...hands, feet larger and BAM!

 

[Atomicchuck3k]

why was he in a body suit?

It was a T-Mobile commercial.

 

[Iron Man™]

Cgi

 

[terry78]

The Hulk is not just tall, he's wide. Much wider than the biggest bodybuilder. About three grown men wide. CG is the only option.

 

[Atomicchuck3k]

The Hulk is not just tall, he's wide. Much wider than the biggest bodybuilder. About three grown men wide. CG is the only option.

Thats why I suggested body suits on the two big guys I selected. That will give them the additional mass they need. CG will just run into the same problem as the first movie, corny looking. The actors in suits will give a much more convincing performance then any computer generated character. CG can be used to make the actors taller and even wider, but 100% will not be as believable. The concept of live actors in body suits combined with CG worked in The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen (Hyde).

 

[Dragon]

The Hulk is not just tall, he's wide. Much wider than the biggest bodybuilder. About three grown men wide. CG is the only option.

The CG Hulk in the film wasn't anywhere near that wide. His proportions weren't too exaggerated but for his big hands and feet.

 

[AVEITWITHJAMON]

The CG Hulk in the film wasn't anywhere near that wide. His proportions weren't too exaggerated but for his big hands and feet.

Your joking right? Watch the scene were he rugby tackles the first tank in the desert, he is nearly as wide as the tank.

CGI is the only way to go for a character with the proportions of the Hulk. Jesus, next you guys will be saying that Galactus should be a man in a suit in an FF movie.

 

[Dragon]

Your joking right? Watch the scene were he rugby tackles the first tank in the desert, he is nearly as wide as the tank.

CGI is the only way to go for a character with the proportions of the Hulk. Jesus, next you guys will be saying that Galactus should be a man in a suit in an FF movie.

He's also taller than the tank. That doesn't mean that he's proportionally the width of THREE MEN.

As for Galatcus. Have you EVER SEEN Galactus????? His proportions are easily that of a normal muscular man. Show me where his proportions are abnormal.

 

[AVEITWITHJAMON]

He's also taller than the tank. That doesn't mean that he's proportionally the width of THREE MEN.

Well considering the tank was about the width of five or six men, i think Hulk is easily that.

As for Galatcus. Have you EVER SEEN Galactus????? His proportions are easily that of a normal muscular man. Show me where his proportions are abnormal.

Show you were his proportions are abnormal? How about the fact that he is the size of a ****ing sky scraper!!!!!!!!!, oh yes, really normal.

 

[Dragon]

Well considering the tank was about the width of five or six men, i think Hulk is easily that.



Show you were his proportions are abnormal? How about the fact that he is the size of a ****ing sky scraper!!!!!!!!!, oh yes, really normal.

Do you know what the word proportion means? It means not just size, but size in relation to other measurement.

Galactus is very tall- but he's not disproportionately built. Even though he's thirty feet tall, he's in the proportion of a man that's say 6' 3" and muscular. His arms, legs, head and torso are all in even proportion.

As for the Hulk- at FIFTEEN friggin' feet tall, yes, he's probably the width of 3 to 4 men. But if he were say 6-7 ft. with the same proportions, he'd only be about the width of 1.5 to 2 men at MOST. The only thing disproportionate is the Hulk's hands and feet.