• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

Marc Forster to Direct World War Z

Rate the Movie

  • 10

  • 9

  • 8

  • 7

  • 6

  • 5

  • 4

  • 3

  • 2

  • 1

  • 10

  • 9

  • 8

  • 7

  • 6

  • 5

  • 4

  • 3

  • 2

  • 1


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I thought he seemed bored as hell.

It's comments like these that make me happy that I don't have to care about other people's opinions.

I really don't see how anyone can watch WWZ and say you'd fall asleep and that Pitt didn't care.
 
Pitt didn't look bored at all. He did a great job as Gerry Lane.

His hair did an even better job though. :o
 
Pitt was the main one pushing to make sure the flick was in order for the most part, with all the bad press it was getting.
 
Pitt gave an understated performance, but he never looked bored, I just thought he did it because he knew the overall story was more important than him being a star in the movie, I thought he did very well in the role.
 
This movie did have a few cheesy parts. The biggest was his wife calling him. Shouldn't she know better not to call back?
 
I thought that as well. But IMO it can be explained away as Gerry did phone her moments before so its logical she presumed all is well.
 
It's comments like these that make me happy that I don't have to care about other people's opinions.

I really don't see how anyone can watch WWZ and say you'd fall asleep and that Pitt didn't care.

That's fine, I really don't have to care that you don't see how I would see it that way. :oldrazz:

I enjoyed the book and thought the movie was alright for what it was, but the performances were flat throughout the whole thing IMO. Pitt especially doesn't really react much to the crazy things happening around him, and I didn't believe his emotional scenes at all, personally. When the military is asking him to leave to help with the problem and he's like "I can't leave my family" he doesn't have any infliction to his voice whatsoever. Further, the majority of his line deliveries are also like this, which just makes him feel like a non-character even though he's the protagonist. He just doesn't seem to care much.

As for my sarcastic falling asleep comments, I felt like the pacing of the movie was predictable, with one convenient set piece after another. "Brad Pitt goes here, big CGI event happens, repeat for 2 hours."

I also didn't find it particularly tense or scary and it was pretty much completely devoid of gore or violence in spite of the source material just to get that classy PG-13 rating.

So, yeah, while I respect both yours and others opinions who enjoyed the movie, it was still World War Zzzzzz for me. :o
 
I don't know when Pitt was strapped to a chair and he was asking for the phone I felt his emotion. I do agree with the "I can't leave my family" line. The editing was fast in this movie. A lot of times it didn't let scene sink in. I chalked that scene up too, no time to sit and mope around, you have to get busy to protect your family. Also, the section of the movie through hospital was filled with tension.
 
Honest Trailers - World War Z

[YT]I2cS5Fv5xIQ[/YT]
 
That's fine, I really don't have to care that you don't see how I would see it that way. :oldrazz:

I enjoyed the book and thought the movie was alright for what it was, but the performances were flat throughout the whole thing IMO. Pitt especially doesn't really react much to the crazy things happening around him, and I didn't believe his emotional scenes at all, personally. When the military is asking him to leave to help with the problem and he's like "I can't leave my family" he doesn't have any infliction to his voice whatsoever. Further, the majority of his line deliveries are also like this, which just makes him feel like a non-character even though he's the protagonist. He just doesn't seem to care much.

As for my sarcastic falling asleep comments, I felt like the pacing of the movie was predictable, with one convenient set piece after another. "Brad Pitt goes here, big CGI event happens, repeat for 2 hours."

I also didn't find it particularly tense or scary and it was pretty much completely devoid of gore or violence in spite of the source material just to get that classy PG-13 rating.

So, yeah, while I respect both yours and others opinions who enjoyed the movie, it was still World War Zzzzzz for me. :o


I found this to easily be the most tension filled zombie movie in years and years. Doesnt react? So him counting the transformation, him taping objects to his body, running to the edge of the building, cutting off the arm. None of that is reacting?
 
I thought World War Z was kind of fragmented but entertaining, and the whole Wales climax was really tension-filled.

Pitt wasn't spectacular--I don't think he ever is--but he was fine.
 
'World War Z' Director Gives His Take On The Controversy And Sequel Talk

Despite the worst kind of pre-release buzz that a tentpole has seen in a long way, "World War Z" did not burst into flames upon its release earlier this year. In fact, it remains one of 2013's biggest hits to date.

The film's success wasn't a surprise to anyone who actually saw the film, which got the benefit of a new ending from Damon Lindelof and Drew Goddard.

Now for the Blu-ray release of the film, MTV News spoke with director Marc Forster about the film's success and what it was like to sit through all that bad press.


How has it been looking back on "World War Z" all these months later?
I'm excited, and I'm also excited because we're releasing the unrated version as well. For a filmmaker, seeing the PG-13 version of a film is always a little more restrictive. Some excited people can experience the unrated one.

What else are you excited for on the Blu-ray?
There's a documentary in it that gives you an hour-long look at how the movie was conceived and how it all came about. I think it's a really good piece. I really like that one as well.

This movie, in particular, had an interesting, very public story arc behind the scenes. How do you look back on the whole process?
I'm obviously very relieved that it became a hit, a movie of this size. Obviously, I was surprised that people were writing a lot about it before, when nobody had seen it. It seemed like nobody had seen the movie and people were still forming opinions. I'm always amazed. How do people know? They haven't seen it. It's different from what you experience with film. I'm truly excited that globally people embraced the film, and they enjoyed themselves like it was something new. It did something new with the genre. The Israel sequence alone was one of the sequences I was very excited about creating and how I envisioned it. It came out the way I wanted it to. I was just glad that people got into it and really enjoyed it.

Are you wary at all of the echo chamber that the internet can become with something like a production? At the same time, it's also how the word spread once "World War Z" was a hit.
It's kind of frightening. I always believed in the movie, and I'm sitting there on set thinking, "This movie really works. Am I crazy?" Then we're having a preview, and it worked in the preview. People were still saying things. I'm reading these things. Where do it come from? People haven't seen it. In the same time, because the public opinion is so strong, you're feeling a little on edge. Once the movie was out and in theaters, I realized people are really embracing it. It was nerve-racking.

What did it mean to you to have an ally like Brad Pitt, who was a star and a producer?
It was great to have him as an ally. We were working on it together for a long time. Ultimately, even the rumors that we weren't talking, there wasn't any truth. I'm just thinking to myself, it didn't affect him as much because he has been living his entire life, of the press writing stuff that really doesn't represent what's actually going on. For someone like me, who hasn't been exposed to that process, it was trickier. At the end of the day, I'm so pleased with the movie because it presented exactly the vision that I always had for it. I'm glad people liked it. When a movie of this size doesn't work, it can really affect your career tremendously.

Brad has already started talking about sequels? Does what happened on "World War Z," especially with the ending, make you reconsider the scale?
It always comes back to character. I feel like on this particular one, the ending, I felt it was crucial to have it intimate and small because it makes it more humane. I think that's the key. If you're going on a second journey, you want to keep that humanity in tact because it's a continuation about how humanity will try to survive and how this will further develop. I think that's the key.

http://moviesblog.mtv.com/2013/09/17/world-war-z-director-sequel/
 
^Good read, thanks, I hope Forster comes back for the sequel, he is an under-rated director in my eyes and he did very well with WWZ.
 
Is the Russian battle/original ending included somewhere on the Bluray?

Doubt it but just wondering.
 
Why You'll Never See World War Z's Original Ending

There were better blockbusters released in theaters this summer, but maybe none as fascinating as World War Z, which looked like a complete catastrophe until it opened to a surprise $66 million and reviews that seemed positive almost despite themselves. Much of the credit went to the film's new ending, which was totally rewritten by Damon Lindelof and Drew Goddard to be a tense interior scene as opposed to yet another battle scene. Marc Forster, who had reportedly feuded with Brad Pitt, was seen as the guy from whom the movie had to be rescued. But now the director is finally giving his side of the story on the film, and those changes that rescued the finale.

"Basically in the original ending, after the Israel sequence and the plane crash, Gerry is in Russia, and the storyline of what he finds out at the WHO lab is what he finds in Russia but he applies his theory in a battlefield setting," Forster explained to Movies.com ahead of the film's release this week on Blu-ray. " We never finished that footage because we all agreed after Israel and the plane crash you’re battle fatigued and you really want the movie to be more quiet and you don’t want it to go into another huge combat situation" As Forster points out, some of the Russian battle sequence can be seen in the quick montage at the end of the film, but the complete sequence will never be seen. "I don’t think you’ll ever see the Russia sequence, because we never really finished it; we never spent the money to do the visual effects. Once we shot it and we did a rough cut, everyone agreed that this is too big and too exhausting, it would be better to go a simpler route."

Apparently ready to let bygones to be bygones, Forster also gets into detail on the film's actual ending, when Brad Pitt's character Gerry gets up close and personal with a zombie in the abandoned wing of the WHO headquarters in Wales:


That tense moment between Gerry and the zombie, and the entire suspenseful sequence inside the WHO office, is much more like a traditional zombie film, in which there isn't the budget to stage the kind of massive action sequences that World War Z thrived on. But that slamming on the brakes, and allowing Gerry to become a hero in a quiet setting, really did rescue the movie. Watching teeming piles of zombies overwhelm Philadelphia and Israel became exhausting well before Forster admitted it did, and especially given how chaotically he edited all of the action sequences, the idea of yet another one-- at night, no less-- would be horrifying. Who knows how Forster came to recognize that what he did with the final sequence didn't work, but kudos to him for being willing to go small-- and now talking about it as if it was all totally fine with him, whether it really was or not.

You can catch World War Z, though not that famously scrapped ending, on Blu-ray this week.

Source: CinemaBlend

http://www.paraddisso.com/2013/09/why-youll-never-see-world-war-zs.html
 
I'm gonna give this movie a 6.5.

Serviceable if you want a by-the-numbers Zombie movie, but I kept losing interest while watching. I wasn't a fan of the whole "sea of zombies" thing they were doing, and I think the fact that I'm still sore about them basically just saying, "F**k it.", to the book detracted me from fully enjoying this as well. There were sooooo many fantastic things from the book that they could have used instead of what they did instead. I was left feeling disappointed and starving for a faithful WWZ adaption, but Pitt was okay. He was what kept me watching, but that's because I'm a fan of the guy. His performance wasn't anything special, but like I said, it was serviceable. And speaking of which, that goes for everyone. Serviceable performances, but I won't remember a single one of these characters in the future. If there is a sequel coming, they need to focus on the book.
 
I'm gonna give this movie a 6.5.

Serviceable if you want a by-the-numbers Zombie movie, but I kept losing interest while watching. I wasn't a fan of the whole "sea of zombies" thing they were doing, and I think the fact that I'm still sore about them basically just saying, "F**k it.", to the book detracted me from fully enjoying this as well. There were sooooo many fantastic things from the book that they could have used instead of what they did instead. I was left feeling disappointed and starving for a faithful WWZ adaption, but Pitt was okay. He was what kept me watching, but that's because I'm a fan of the guy. His performance wasn't anything special, but like I said, it was serviceable. And speaking of which, that goes for everyone. Serviceable performances, but I won't remember a single one of these characters in the future. If there is a sequel coming, they need to focus on the book.

Tom-Cruise-No.gif
 
An 8.5/10.

Second behind STID as my favorite of this year.

The gif isn't supposed to be funny btw, you're supposed to be feeling Tom's emotion. :o
 
Well, I'm reading the book right now for English.

I hope it doesn't change on my outlook on what I thought to be an amazing movie.
 
Enlighten me.

Well, I'm reading the book right now for English.

I hope it doesn't change on my outlook on what I thought to be an amazing movie.

It might be different since you've seen the movie instead of reading the book first. I actually prefer watching movies before reading the books because according to disgruntled fans there's always less disappointment that way.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"