Dope Nose
Sidekick
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2002
- Messages
- 3,332
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Varient said:It'd be canon that the surfer w/o any power adjustments on either guy will beat Captain America EVERYTIME.
Yet because they have never fought,..... it can't be canon by your definition.
it would certainly be considered canon that the Surfer is more powerful than Captain America because their individual power levels have been clearly defined within the context of the Marvel U and while it would seem obvious that the Surfer would beat Cap in a fight you can't say that it's canon that he has.
Varient said:So,... While I now understand where you two are coming from,... Mine is still valid because Most of mine would come under the "canon" definition of character development - You know Captain America is a Patriot,... his robbing the Statue of Liberty is out of character and against the canon of his behavior.
it's certainly unlikely that Cap would rob the Statue of Liberty and you could say that it's canon that he has never committed such a robbery but going back to my original point none of what you've posted would be considered canon, regardless of whether you feel it would fit with the character's behavior.
The Avengers DON'T have three teams. Ben Reilly DIDN'T survive. Matt Murdock DIDN'T regain his sight. you can't say that something is canon and follow it by speculating on what you think the character would or wouldn't do. you can't say that it's canon that Ben Grimm would marry Sharon Ventura because that isn't what happened. Ben Grimm DIDN'T marry Sharon. Following the definition you listed, none of what you posted could be considered to have inarguable existence within the fictional universe because none of it happened.