Mission: Impossible 3

Isn't he making his version of the theme?
Because that twister song better not be it
 
Yo the Theme that Kanye did is BETTER than "Impossible" I'm feeling the drum machine and the keys on it. You know 'Ye was banging the MPC machine hard on this lol :) Oh it's so damn souful especially at like 1:50.


I'm listening to it now for the first time

I'm feeling it, that's hot. and I like the soulful break 3/4's in, you know he's to say trying Ethan Hunt is on suave **** with it.

Kanye did it again!
 
http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=14059

New M:i:III TV Spot and Art!

Source: Paramount Pictures
April 12, 2006




mi3tvspot5.jpg

Paramount Pictures has provided ComingSoon.net with a fifth TV spot for Mission: Impossible III, opening in theaters on May 5th. The clip, which features new footage from the antipated sequel, can be viewed in various formats here! The studio has also released new bus shelter art (similar to the German poster), available here, and horizontal art, which is up here.

Tom Cruise returns as Special Agent Ethan Hunt, who faces the mission of his life in the third film of the franchise. Director J.J. Abrams (Lost, Alias) brings his unique blend of action and drama to the billion-dollar franchise.

Philip Seymour Hoffman, Ving Rhames, Laurence Fishburne, Billy Crudup, Michelle Monaghan, Jonathan Rhys-Meyers, Keri Russell and Maggie Q co-star.
 
I know I am being picky, but what do you all think of that explosion sequence on the bridge in the trailer?
It irks me because it seems to me Tom Cruise should be flying forward towards the camera since the explosion was behind him. I am still trying to figure out how an explosion behind him would blow him 90 degrees to his left...
Of course, I am no physicist.
 
I was walking to lunch, and saw the poster for this on a bus stop shelter, and some guys were walking past and one of them was like, "Part three? Why are they still making this ****?" I had to laugh, and he looked over and was like, "it's true."
 
Kinda a dumb question to ask,i mean Hollywood's number 1 goal is to make money hence why there are 4 Lethal weapons and 3 Die Hards and Bond 21 is in the works along with Indy 4,
when a franchise has had previously successful movies,studios wish to keep their faith in a proven product
 
For real though, and this actually looks like it has potential (Cast and crew) but Tom gotta a lotta damage control to deal with (not just tomkat but MI 2 was atrocious in many people's eyes and those type of big budget action movies are flopping like the Island)
 
Super_Ludacris said:
For real though, and this actually looks like it has potential (Cast and crew) but Tom gotta a lotta damage control to deal with (not just tomkat but MI 2 was atrocious in many people's eyes and those type of big budget action movies are flopping like the Island)
Agreed,although i think the fact the guy behind LOST is directing will help it somewhat
Honestly i expect a few movies to make less this year,i think last year set a trend and SR and POTC2 will feel this as well,DVD is changing expectations for Cinema BO IMO especially as relates to repeat viewing
 
terry78 said:
I was walking to lunch, and saw the poster for this on a bus stop shelter, and some guys were walking past and one of them was like, "Part three? Why are they still making this ****?" I had to laugh, and he looked over and was like, "it's true."

Uhhh why is Mission Impossible being singled out? At least half of the movies in Hollwood being released are some kind of sequel, remake, prequel, etc. ...lol. But for me this is only Mission Impossible. I refuse to accept that other thing called MI2 as an actual sequel. :o
 
hunter rider said:
Agreed,although i think the fact the guy behind LOST is directing will help it somewhat
Honestly i expect a few movies to make less this year,i think last year set a trend and SR and POTC2 will feel this as well,DVD is changing expectations for Cinema BO IMO especially as relates to repeat viewing


Well hence why said because of cast and crew this film got potential (throw in fat boy PSH too)
 
Even though that might be the case (with JJ Abrams directing), I still don't know what to think nor I'm interested in the final product. I probably won't see it in theaters. Trust me, I'm an open minded guy.

It's not because of TomKat but more like...I felt like this sequel is along the lines of "Legend of Zorro": Not needed.
 
Octoberist said:
Even though that might be the case (with JJ Abrams directing), I still don't know what to think nor I'm interested in the final product. I probably won't see it in theaters. Trust me, I'm an open minded guy.

It's not because of TomKat but more like...I felt like this sequel is along the lines of "Legend of Zorro": Not needed.
Same could be said of Bond 21,POTC2 or Indy 4 etc..
 
Zorro needed a sequel,bandares was to good a zorro not to do a sequel..

Oh and i agree with Hunter.

:up:
 
Octoberist said:
Even though that might be the case (with JJ Abrams directing), I still don't know what to think nor I'm interested in the final product. I probably won't see it in theaters. Trust me, I'm an open minded guy.

It's not because of TomKat but more like...I felt like this sequel is along the lines of "Legend of Zorro": Not needed.

Well as long as these movies keep making enough money to warrant a sequel theres not really much to avoid it. The studios see an interest from the people and they give them more of it while they cash in.
 
HERE'S MY TAKE:

Casino Royale---- It's nothing against Daniel Craig, but I feel like they should give Bond a rest. He's done everything already. I have a fear that the producers might make Bond TOO REALISTIC and too Bourne Indenity like.

INDY 4--- I don't want this movie to happen. Sure maybe 10 years ago, but not now. Espically with Mr. Ford being Mr. Grumpy.

POTC 2--- My fear is that it won't be as entertaining as the first, judging from the sequel trends through out the years. And honestly, the plot is almost the same as the first...
 
Octoberist said:
It's not because of TomKat but more like...I felt like this sequel is along the lines of "Legend of Zorro": Not needed.

By definition, no sequel is "needed". Even Back to the Future wasn't meant to have a sequel, as the first film's ending was meant to be nothing more than a joke to end the film.
 
Here me out: It's just my take but I'm keeping my expectations low. Here are the positives:

Casino Royale: I'm glad that they're trying to break new ground with this Bond. Grittier, edgier.

POTC2: I love Johnny Depp and the new fantasy aspect gives me chills.

INDY 4: .................10 years too late!
 
Octoberist said:
Here me out: It's just my take but I'm keeping my expectations low. Here are the positives:

Casino Royale: I'm glad that they're trying to break new ground with this Bond. Grittier, edgier.

POTC2: I love Johnny Depp and the new fantasy aspect gives me chills.

Stop trying to have it both ways!! Either you're looking forward to the movies, or you think it'll just repeat what's been done. Make up your mind! I can't stand indecisive people!:mad: (j/k)
 
MUAHAHAHA!

In sheer honesty, I'm looking foward to Casino Royale and Pirates 2. But I'm keeping my expecations low just in case.

Indy 4...on the other hand....let me say it again "10 years too late".
 
I remember not caring for the first one and the sequel is one of the worse movies that I have ever laid eyes on. I would be an idiot to think that this movie is going to turn out alright. I forgot to mention, I hate Tom Cruise, I've hated his overated butt for years. I'm not one of those bandwagon jumpers.

BTW: Lost is my favorite show.
 
I SEE SPIDEY said:
I remember not caring for the first one and the sequel is one of the worse movies that I have ever laid eyes on. I would be an idiot to think that this movie is going to turn out alright. I forgot to mention, I hate Tom Cruise, I've hated his overated butt for years. I'm not one of those bandwagon jumpers.

.
I actually think the complete opposite to everything you just typed and that's whats cool about movies
icon12.gif
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"