More orgasms for women with wealthy partners

Galactus

Devourer of Worlds
Joined
Sep 1, 2000
Messages
16,277
Reaction score
1
Points
31
NBR staff | Monday January 19 2009 - 05:10pm
Women receive more pleasure from making love to a man with a bigger bank balance, according to a new UK study that argues the richer he is, the more often she orgasms.

Newcastle University psychologist Dr Thomas Pollet said to the Times Online that “Women’s orgasm frequency increases with the income of their partner.”

Dr Pollet believes that the results suggest, from an evolutionary psychology perspective, that women have strong genetic programming to be gold diggers that drives them to select mates based on their perceived quality.

Evolutionary psychology theory suggests men and women’s behaviour is learned and encoded from ancient times, with an emphasis on Darwinian selection at the gene level in order to ensure species survival - as Richard Dawkins further argued in The Selfish Gene.

Scientists find the female orgasm fascinating for many reasons, but particularly because it serves no reproductive purpose; women can become pregnant whether they orgasm or not.

However, Dr Pollet and his co-author Professor Daniel Nettle believe female orgasm is an evolutionary adaptation that drives women to select high-quality partners.

The two men tested their hypothesis using data from 5,000 Chinese people, and found that while many there were many factors at play in how many orgasms a woman was given by her partner, money was one of the main ones.

“Increasing partner income had a highly positive effect on women’s self-reported frequency of orgasm. More desirable mates cause women to experience more orgasms”, said Dr Pollet to the Times Online.

Research in America and Germany has confirmed that body symmetry and attractiveness are also linked with orgasm frequency – but money seems even more important.
 
so really, it's the money that makes them orgasm? lol
 
I'm betting there are more than quite a few well to do guys out there with very impressive....packages. :o Of course personally it's how a guy uses it that counts. Having enough money to alleviate where bill money is coming from does tend to lessen stress and allow for nothing but happy thoughts though. Which I believe would increase the pleasure responses in women so we can have better orgasms.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
then why is the divorce rate highest in the upper class regime?
 
Exactly what I was thinking.

Also, the women were probably faking a lot with their wealthy partners as part of the gold-digging process. :hehe:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
5,000 chinese women......

ha, there's a joke in there somewhere.....


That's what she said....
 
I don't agree with this at all........

I don't see how making love to someone with more money would give me any more pleasure than making love to someone I'm totally in love and obsessed with.
 
I don't agree with this at all........

I don't see how making love to someone with more money would give me any more pleasure than making love to someone I'm totally in love and obsessed with.
Well....if you're totally in love and obsessed with money...
 
NBR staff | Monday January 19 2009 - 05:10pm
Women receive more pleasure from making love to a man with a bigger bank balance, according to a new UK study that argues the richer he is, the more often she orgasms.

Newcastle University psychologist Dr Thomas Pollet said to the Times Online that “Women’s orgasm frequency increases with the income of their partner.”

Dr Pollet believes that the results suggest, from an evolutionary psychology perspective, that women have strong genetic programming to be gold diggers that drives them to select mates based on their perceived quality.

Evolutionary psychology theory suggests men and women’s behaviour is learned and encoded from ancient times, with an emphasis on Darwinian selection at the gene level in order to ensure species survival - as Richard Dawkins further argued in The Selfish Gene.

Scientists find the female orgasm fascinating for many reasons, but particularly because it serves no reproductive purpose; women can become pregnant whether they orgasm or not.

However, Dr Pollet and his co-author Professor Daniel Nettle believe female orgasm is an evolutionary adaptation that drives women to select high-quality partners.

The two men tested their hypothesis using data from 5,000 Chinese people, and found that while many there were many factors at play in how many orgasms a woman was given by her partner, money was one of the main ones.

“Increasing partner income had a highly positive effect on women’s self-reported frequency of orgasm. More desirable mates cause women to experience more orgasms”, said Dr Pollet to the Times Online.

Research in America and Germany has confirmed that body symmetry and attractiveness are also linked with orgasm frequency – but money seems even more important.


I've heard of coming into money, but this is ridiculous!

*rimshot*

That's it, I'm done and gone from this thread.
 
I don't agree with this at all........

I don't see how making love to someone with more money would give me any more pleasure than making love to someone I'm totally in love and obsessed with.
i suppose the idea is that you are more obsessed with those who are able to cater for you.

kinda like the way we determine our physical attractiveness to a toned body is because they seem more likely to survive in the wild and provide food and fend off attackers etc...or with child bearing hips, enabling a man to cater for his needs to spread his seed

so the emphasis on a hunter/gatherer (apparently) has become less about physical stature and more about financial stature.
 
i suppose the idea is that you are more obsessed with those who are able to cater for you.

kinda like the way we determine our physical attractiveness to a toned body is because they seem more likely to survive in the wild and provide food and fend off attackers etc...or with child bearing hips, enabling a man to cater for his needs to spread his seed

so the emphasis on a hunter/gatherer (apparently) has become less about physical stature and more about financial stature.

Pretty much....it's not about who can kill the most animals and bring home the pelts anymore....it's about who's got the money/power....
 
"Scientists find the female orgasm fascinating for many reasons, but particularly because it serves no reproductive purpose;"

Yes it does.

The purpose of the orgasm is to make sex pleasurable so that we -want- to do it, and reproduce. If a woman doesn't enjoy sex, she probably doesn't want to have it, and therefore, cannot get pregnant.

Just because a woman's orgasm doesn't shoot a huge load of white re-productive liquid doesn't mean it doesn't serve a reproductive purpose.
 
Rich people average with 1 or 2 children, while the poor can have 5 or 6 (or in the case of the Duggar family, 18) kids.

So does this mean poor women are having tons upon tons of orgasm-less sex? And they still keep doing it?
 
I don't know how this investigation or whatever you call it can produce accurate results. What did they do? Go round asking a load of woman who are married to rich guys how many times they orgasm?
 
Rich people average with 1 or 2 children, while the poor can have 5 or 6 (or in the case of the Duggar family, 18) kids.

So does this mean poor women are having tons upon tons of orgasm-less sex? And they still keep doing it?

When you ain't got no money, there ain't much to do but work and ****.....
 
"Scientists find the female orgasm fascinating for many reasons, but particularly because it serves no reproductive purpose;"

Yes it does.

The purpose of the orgasm is to make sex pleasurable so that we -want- to do it, and reproduce. If a woman doesn't enjoy sex, she probably doesn't want to have it, and therefore, cannot get pregnant.

Just because a woman's orgasm doesn't shoot a huge load of white re-productive liquid doesn't mean it doesn't serve a reproductive purpose.

Eh, we can just go around raping each other like other animals do. Although, if that were the case, our society likely would've developed into something much different than it is.
 
"Scientists find the female orgasm fascinating for many reasons, but particularly because it serves no reproductive purpose;"

Yes it does.

The purpose of the orgasm is to make sex pleasurable so that we -want- to do it, and reproduce. If a woman doesn't enjoy sex, she probably doesn't want to have it, and therefore, cannot get pregnant.

Just because a woman's orgasm doesn't shoot a huge load of white re-productive liquid doesn't mean it doesn't serve a reproductive purpose.
I also heard somewere that Orgasm in females makes the sperm flow more easily?
 
"Scientists find the female orgasm fascinating for many reasons, but particularly because it serves no reproductive purpose;"

Yes it does.

The purpose of the orgasm is to make sex pleasurable so that we -want- to do it, and reproduce. If a woman doesn't enjoy sex, she probably doesn't want to have it, and therefore, cannot get pregnant.

Just because a woman's orgasm doesn't shoot a huge load of white re-productive liquid doesn't mean it doesn't serve a reproductive purpose.

Very good point.

People tend to forget that the entire biological purpose of the sex drive is reproduction. It doesn't matter if you're straight, gay, bi or furry...the core reason for experiencing "the urge" is survival of the species, like it or not. :oldrazz:
 
Women still feel pleasure from sex before orgasm just like we do.
 
Im going to slap my woman round with a wad full of 50s tonight!!! POW! Money talks *****
 
A lot of the time women orgasm from oral sex more often than full sex. Maybe rich blokes just like muff diving more than the average man? :hehe:
 
This is strange. It's again one of those random scientific sexual articles that come out every month. Last month wasn't it, "Men respond better to women in red dresses."

Huh?

I don't understand how they get this data. They can't go around asking 5,000 women about this, or hell, even tell the truth.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
201,149
Messages
21,907,126
Members
45,704
Latest member
BMD
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"