Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates.
Starting January 9th, site maintenance is ongoing until further notice, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into.
We apologize for the inconvenience.
Due to recent news involving X, formerly Twitter and its owner, the staff of SuperHeroHype have decided it would be best to no longer allow links on the board. Starting January 31st, users will no longer be able to post direct links to X on this site, however screenshots will still be allowed as long as they follow Hype rules and guidelines. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Here is a basic summaryIt was so excessive anyway.
How he integrated burkahs and Jason Vorhees is ****ing beyond me.
Scrum said:For the most part I agree with kainedamo.. but one of the reasons that burkas are a 'sign of oppression' is that they stand for the subserviant role that many Muslim women have held for thousands of years.
Thats interesting considering Islam has only been in existenced as an organized religion for over 1400 years.
Also burkas are only in a limited number of countries like Afghanistan (After the Taliban came into rule), and some in Pakistan, and northern India and is not indicative of the whole Muslim world.
IT IS NOT A REQUIREMENT OF ISLAM.
But, it doesn't make the banning of them right. If the woman wants to wear it and perpetuate the thought that it's okay to think of women as lower than men, then by all means perpetuate away. But when women are forced to wear them is where it becomes a true problem, and where a problem should be made out of it.
hippie_hunter said:I think banning the burka is rather ignorant if you ask me
Wilhelm-Scream said:Don't worry. You're like Van Gogh.
Long after you're dead the world will catch up to how brilliant you are.