• Super Maintenance

    Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates.

    Starting January 9th, site maintenance is ongoing until further notice, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into.

    We apologize for the inconvenience.

NASA needs $1bn to protect Earth from asteroids...

The Spawn

Better Than You
Joined
Aug 10, 2002
Messages
19,505
Reaction score
1
Points
31
...should they get what they need?

Nasa needs $1bn to protect Earth from asteroids
Congress says it's too much

Ian Williams, vnunet.com 07 Mar 2007
Nasa scientists have warned that it will cost too much money to track potentially dangerous asteroids and comets which could threaten the Earth.

In a report previewed by a Planetary Defence Conference in Washington on Monday, officials said it would cost about $1bn to find and track around 90 per cent of the estimated 20,000 potentially hazardous near earth objects (NEOs) by 2020.

"We know what to do, we just don't have the money," said Simon Worden, director of Nasa's Ames Research Centre.

The report follows a request from US Congress in 2005 for Nasa to create a plan to find, track and possibly deflect the most dangerous NEOs.

Nasa already tracks some of the largest space debris, of at least 1,000m in diameter, but hopes to track smaller objects down to a diameter of 140m which are still large enough to cause major devastation.

These NEOs pose a significant threat even if they do not collide directly with the planet. If they were to touch the planet's atmosphere, the shockwaves created by explosions from the heat could still be catastrophic.

Nasa has offered three possible solutions. The first is to create a ground telescope dedicated to the job of hunting and tracking asteroids. This would work in conjunction with other agencies' telescopes and cost around $800m.

The second, but most expensive, option is to launch a space infrared telescope dedicated to the job costing an estimated $1bn.

The third, and cheapest, option would be to use existing telescopes from agencies around the world at a cost of around $300m.

Unfortunately the White House has rejected the proposals, deeming them all too costly.

"The decision of the agency is that we just cannot do anything about it right now," said Nasa programme scientist Lindley Johnson.
 
sure, let's spend multi-billions of dollars on some stupid war that doesn't matter one way or the other, but when a threat comes along that could wipe out the entire planet?

nope, no money for you.

i can see the logic there. :rolleyes:
 
With all the problems they have with their current technology, it's not worth spending on. And I don't mean the threat isn't eminent. NASA should fix itself before it starts on new goals.
 
really!?
do you know how many Magic Bullets i could buy with 1 billion dollars!??!!?
 
didnt reagan already have the starwars project up?? cant we reconfigure it for asteroids:o
 
didnt reagan already have the starwars project up?? cant we reconfigure it for asteroids:o
what Star Wars project!?
i'm still waiting for my Back to the Future project!
WE'RE ALL SUPPOSED TO HAVE HOVER BOARDS BY THE YEAR 2000!!!:cmad:
what a jip!
 
what Star Wars project!?
i'm still waiting for my Back to the Future project!
WE'RE ALL SUPPOSED TO HAVE HOVER BOARDS BY THE YEAR 2000!!!:cmad:
what a jip!
starwars project.. to intercept incoming ICBMS:ninja:


its 2025 dear... the year he was at
 
starwars project.. to intercept incoming ICBMS:ninja:


its 2025 dear... the year he was at
oooOOOOO!
that sounds like a completely useless plan that would cost a lot of money and deplete the ozone.
and we're never going to make it to 2025. just so everyone knows.
don't get your hopes up about hoverboards people, it's NEVER. GOING. TO. HAPPEN.

was there anybody else ****ting bricks on August 29th, 1997 like i was!?
 
starwars project.. to intercept incoming ICBMS:ninja:


its 2025 dear... the year he was at


Oh my God, where have you guys been the past two decades? That 'Star Wars' project was a sham, a propaganda tool against the Soviets! They never had anything to make it work! They're selling the same B.S. with a different name, that missle shield defense nonsense!
 
They just need these men.

Arm-MenLeave.jpg


and of course Aerosmith to sing the theme song.

...I don't wanna close my eyes....
 
A plan against asteroids should have been done,its a shame only the USA and UK are bothering to do anything about it.
 
1Billion? Thats it...and how much are we spending on the war?
 
Yeah, 1 billion is chump change. I'd much rather the money from my paycheck went to some NASA harebrained scheme than some neo con harebrained scheme.
 
NASA needs 1billion to redirect an asteroid to not hit the US. They never said anything about stopping it.
 
A billion's just a drop in the bucket for the United States. We spend that much and more every year to **** countries in Africa. This is atleast worth the money.
 
They just need these men.

Arm-MenLeave.jpg


and of course Aerosmith to sing the theme song.

...I don't wanna close my eyes....

Damn that movie sucked. I should have spent my 5 bucks on Deep Impact instead
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"