The Apatow Crew
New God
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2005
- Messages
- 100,338
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
****ing double standards thats all i'm gonna say. i'm not gonna get into yet another damn fight over this with you TW.
JackBauer said:don't generalize there partner. I had no problem with it.
It's not a double standard. A double standard would mean that they are on the same level.J Alba's Lover said:****ing double standards thats all i'm gonna say. i'm not gonna get into yet another damn fight over this with you TW.
hunter rider said:This thread was all a devious machination
Not everyone cared about Jessica being nude in SC,only some hardcore comic fans and lets face it they need something with every adaption to moan about
Here's the difference,in the SC books the character is drawn naked,in the film RR made it panel for panel like the books except for Jessica's scene's which he altered.thus why some were annoyed
Nathalie's character is a hooker in this,she may shoot a sex scene which shows what a hooker is,you can do that without her being nude so it isn't a double standard
As for Closer it was a film about characters so the nudity wasnt needed,SC was a brash gaudy gratuitous type of book and thus the movie depicted it as so only minus Jess' boobies for reasons that seem to be RR's
Thank you. That's such an excellent point I was trying to get across.hunter rider said:This thread was all a devious machination
Not everyone cared about Jessica being nude in SC,only some hardcore comic fans and lets face it they need something with every adaption to moan about
Here's the difference,in the SC books the character is drawn naked,in the film RR made it panel for panel like the books except for Jessica's scene's which he altered.thus why some were annoyed
Nathalie's character is a hooker in this,she may shoot a sex scene which shows what a hooker is,you can do that without her being nude so it isn't a double standard
As for Closer it was a film about characters so the nudity wasnt needed,SC was a brash gaudy gratuitous type of book and thus the movie depicted it as so only minus Jess' boobies for reasons that seem to be RR's
Kmack said:Hey Hunter!!!![]()
JAL you know why you brought this up but yes you are on this occasion wrongJ Alba's Lover said:never mind i'm wrong like always. just ftreaking forget i even brought the damn freaking thing up!
t*ts.t*ts.t*ts,t*ts
thats al lthe matters right?
hunter rider said:JAL you know why you brought this up but yes you are on this occasion wrong
J Alba's Lover said:no but you people are cool with portman not being naked but have a fit with alba. i mean there both damn strippers.
why is it always cool for one but not the other?
this is total bull**** i think.
you people are always defending portman but bashing the hell out of alba.
I was talking about everyone else that does.hunter rider said:Ive never bashed Alba and i explained what the difference was but you ignored me
But why did she ask the director to cut it out then?Darthphere said:Cool, and Natalie doesnt have a problem with nudity anyway, they filmed topless scenes in Closer.
J Alba's Lover said:But why did she ask the director to cut it out then?
i mean you do it or not. you don't do it and then run to the editor to ask him to take it out.
J Alba's Lover said:I was talking about everyone else that does.
ones that make it seem what ever portman does shes a god for it.
from robert rodiguez and Jessica Alba's mouth they said nudity was a option but they choose to not do it.
but hey don't nobody listen to a damn word i say no one ever does.
fine its all the same to me anyway.Darthphere said:She didnt, the director edited them out himself.
*JAL grasps at straws*
J Alba's Lover said:fine its all the same to me anyway.
yeah i'm sure after she asked him.
why hel lwould i watch orpah.Darthphere said:Actually she didnt, watch Oprah sometime.
J Alba's Lover said:why hel lwould i watch orpah.
and its not like actually gonna tell anyomne she did.