I thought that was every director that recently made a good movie.
Him & the Oblivion & Tron: Legacy guy
You know, Paul Verhoeven might be a better director to compare him to than some of the others mentioned. Both directors appear to be drawn to special effects-laden sci-fi/action projects that double as social commentaries.
You know, Paul Verhoeven might be a better director to compare him to than some of the others mentioned. Both directors appear to be drawn to special effects-laden sci-fi/action projects that double as social commentaries.
I do not trust Kosinski with Star Wars... he's good, but not "Star Wars" good.
Please dont try to shove a young director , that has been making original stuff into franchises properties , most of it that are nothing but pure derivate of works that Blomkamp is already addressing. Let the man make his own movies.
"Star Wars good"? What is that supposed to mean? Are you implying that Star Wars has super high standards of quality?
Please dont try to shove a young director , that has been making original stuff into franchises properties , most of it that are nothing but pure derivate of works that Blomkamp is already addressing. Let the man make his own movies.
Your tone sounds offended. What I'm implying is that the OT Star Was set a high standard for sci-fi movies and movies period, and how I feel that Abrams is perfectly suited to continue what the OT started because of his immense love and knowledge of Star Wars, whereas I would not feel as safe with Kosinki helming the movie because Tron was good but not great to me, and definitely not good enough to hand over the continuing Star Wars franchise to him. Whereas Star Trek was fantastic and reinvigorated the franchise, while also converting a lot of people who were not fans of Trek before. I see the same thing happening with Abrams' Star Wars. Understand now?"Star Wars good"? What is that supposed to mean? Are you implying that Star Wars has super high standards of quality?
Please dont try to shove a young director , that has been making original stuff into franchises properties , most of it that are nothing but pure derivate of works that Blomkamp is already addressing. Let the man make his own movies.
"Star Wars good"? What is that supposed to mean? Are you implying that Star Wars has super high standards of quality?
It's not the quality necessarily, just the tone and style. Neil rocks the old school Cameron style of visceral un-hinged true sci fi. Where as Star Wars requires more adventure/fantasy and so forth (which something ST09 did great with just a great adventure). I think that Neil just needs to stick with these kind of sci-fi's. He might be able to do a Star Wars film, but his grittiness and just visceral nature really does not fit it as well as many other directors.
That was referring to Kosinki, not Blomkamp.
Never thought Damon could look this sexy badass.
i do think that if Nolan directed his first movie in 2008-2009 that it would be effects heavy. a strong scifi movie. they started at different times.
Poor Blomkamp, when fanboys get this far up a director's caboose it's only a matter of time before they turn on him.![]()