SuperFerret
King of the Urban Jungle
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2004
- Messages
- 33,639
- Reaction score
- 6
- Points
- 58
To be fair, it used to have Gargoyles.
So did the local networks after school.
To be fair, it used to have Gargoyles.
To be fair, it used to have Gargoyles.
People are forgetting that Nick, which used to have a lot of really quality shows and was more interested in using good TV to entertain kids without talking down to them, has for the past couple of years been using the same formula as MTV.
Pretty much.Nickelodeon has fallen the furthest, followed by Cartoon Network. As far as I'm concerned the Disney Channel has always sucked.
Definitely. I think BET worse because other than showing crappy hip-hop songs and shelling most other black artists out, they ripoff a lot of bad MTV shows (College Hill, The Hills), and have basically went to actually reinforcing stereotypes instead of straying away from. With that saying, The Black Panther animated series might change my mindt:.
Hey, how long has it been since this series was announced? Will it ever hit the air?
On another note:
Disney can't sell Mickey Mouse and co to an audience that's outgrown him or has never known him. Ask a kid today who Mickey Mouse or any Disney character pre-1989 (Little Mermaid) and you'll be met withexpressions from them. The only Disney characters people recognize instantly today are the Princesses, and Winnie-the-Pooh. This is why these characters are rarely pushed anymore.
This is why Disney was forced to re-imagine their business model with live action shows. With their animated characters aging out, they needed to create characters today's children's audience could identify with. Plus these shows are MUCH cheaper to produce than animated shows. A Raven, Hannah Montana, or a Zack and Cody costs $500,000 an episode while an episode of Gargoyles or an episode of Replacements costs $3 million an episode.
Plus the turnaround time on a live action show is a lot faster. 13-26 episodes of Zack and Cody can be filmed in 3-6 months while an 13 episodes of an animated series can take a year or longer due to complete due to the outsourcing of animation to China and filming of frames.
The only drawback is that we may see a flood of Child stars in ten years writing tell alls and complaining about how they've been typecast in the vein of Danny Bonaduce, Todd Bridges and Gary Colemans.
Nickelodeon - it used to be amazing in the 90's
but SpongeBob still brings in consistent viewers, even after a decade....TV is a fickle mistress, Kids TV is even worse...i thought 'Life and Times of Juniper Lee' was a great show, but it did not catch on
Hey, how long has it been since this series was announced? Will it ever hit the air?
well as kids tv is very subjective, isn't quality as well??...while I don't think SpongeBob reinvents the wheel, i find it funny and it does have a good message...plus my niece and nephew love the "Best day ever" song
Cartoon Network has fallen the most because of just how great it once was...at one time there was literally nothing BUT quality original cartoons on it. Disney and Nick were never on CN's level to begin with, although SBSP is an awesome show and some of Nick;s live action shows like All That were actually pretty clever as well.
I'm not going to be a hater on any network because all three channels have at one time been really great and still today have some quality or at least amusing shows.Nick never on Cartoon Network's quality? I think its fair to say there was a time that both networks were on an even with each other. Nick did have SNICK, Game shows, and some pretty good nicktoons.