Yet... these 2 writers didn't make it so Cyclops' death affected everyone around him...
Do you mean to tell me that Fox's parameters were:
"We don't want Cyclops in this movie because James Marsden went to Superman Returns. So we're going to RESIGN THE ACTOR, and PAY HIM TO BE IN OUR MOVIE, but you have to kill him off early in the film. And on top of killing him off, he must be mentioned as little as possible for the remainder of the film."???
Oh, by the way, Fox is going to market the **** out of Cyclops, despite the fact that they don't want him anywhere near their franchise.
I'm sorry, I don't buy it.
Parameters = "James Marsden is going to be shooting Superman Returns for a good percentage of our scheduled shoot, so you need to find some way to work around that schedule and fit him into the story."
Kinberg & Penn: "We have a limited time to work with Marsden? Let's kill him off, that won't take much time at all"
^ That's more like it.
Why would Fox allow Ratner to shoot a MORE EXPENSIVE 3rd act, but not allow him to utilize a bit more of the Cyclops character? I doubt that Kinberg and Penn or Ratner ever fought for more Cyclops. They wrote his role a small role, because they had limited time to work with the actor, and it was the easiest thing to come up with. They had no intentions of going back, and doing a bit of creative work to work the character into the climax of the film. They were perfectly content with his role... AS THEY'VE STATED MANY TIMES ON THE XVERSE!!!
Penn said pretty directly "Considering the parameters we had, I am VERY HAPPY WITH CYCLOPS' ROLE"
And how many times has Kinberg said he was proud of Cyclops' role.
They actually think what they did was okay.